Jump to content

Modular Neutron Array

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Muonchaser (talk | contribs) at 03:55, 12 June 2008. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

The MoNA Detector Array

File:Mona new.jpg
The MoNA Array

The Modular Neutron Array (MoNA) is a large-area, high efficiency neutron detector designed for detecting neutrons stemming from breakup reactions of fast fragmentation beams. It is located at Michigan State University's National Superconducting Cyclotron Laboratory and has a homepage. In its standard configuration, MoNA has an active area of 2.0 m wide by 1.6 m tall. It measures both the position and time of neutron events with multiple-hit capability. The energy of a neutron is based on a time-of-flight measurement. This information together with the detected position of the neutron is used to construct the momentum vector of the neutrons [1][2].

The detection efficiency of MoNA is maximized for the high-beam velocities that are available at the NSCL's Coupled Cyclotron Facility. For neutrons ranging from 50 to 250 MeV in energy, it is designed to have an efficiency of up to 70% and expands the possible coincidence experiments with neutrons to measurements which were previously not feasible. The detector is used in combination with the Sweeper magnet [3][4][5][6]Cite error: A <ref> tag is missing the closing </ref> (see the help page).. In addition, MoNA’s modular design allows it to be transported between experimental vaults and thus to be used in combination with the Sweeper magnet installed at the S800 magnet spectrograph [7]. Due to its high-energy detection efficiency, this detector will be well suited for experiments with fast fragmentation beams at the proposed ISF.

History

When the NSCL upgraded their capabilities to the Coupled Cyclotron Facility, an FSU/MSU consortium built the Sweeper magnet to be used with two existing neutron walls to perform neutron–fragment coincidence experiments. The neutron walls were originally built for lower beam energies and had only an efficiency of about 12% for the neutron energies expected from the CCF. During the 2000 NSCL users meeting a working group realized the opportunity to significantly enhance the efficiency with an array of more layers using plastic scintillator detectors.

Several NSCL users from undergraduate schools were present at the working group meeting and they suggested that the modular nature and simple construction would offer great opportunities to involve undergraduate students.

In the spring of 2001 the idea evolved into several MRI proposals submitted by 10 different institutions, most of them undergraduate schools. The proposals were funded by the NSF in the summer of 2001. Following the detailed design, the first modules of the detector array were delivered in the summer of 2002. During the following year all modules were assembled and tested by undergraduate students at their school [8], and finally added to form the complete array at the NSCL.

The MoNA collaboration continued after the initial phase of construction and commissioning was concluded [MoNA], and is now using the detector array for experiments, giving a large number of undergraduate students from all collaborating schools the opportunity to take part in cutting-edge nuclear physics experiments at one of the world’s leading rare-isotope facilities. The research at the undergraduate institutions is funded by the NSF through several RUI grants (Research at Undergraduate Institutions).

The MoNA Collaboration

The MoNA project is a collaboration between ten colleges and universities that originally constructed the highly efficient large-area neutron detector for the detection of high-energy neutrons to be used in experiments with fast rare isotopes at the National Superconducting Cyclotron Laboratory. The project is funded by the National Science Foundation.

The members of the collaboration are

Michigan State University (Michael Thoennessen, Thomas Baumann)
Hope College (Paul DeYoung, Graham F. Peaslee)
Florida State University (Kirby W. Kemper)
Indiana University South Bend (Jerry D. Hinnefeld)
Marquette University (Ruth Howes)
Wabash College (James A. Brown)
Central Michigan University (Joseph E. Finck)
Western Michigan University (Paul V. Pancella)
Concordia College at Moorhead (Bryan A. Luther)
Westmont College (Warren F. Rogers)

The Collaboration is committed to involving undergraduates in significant parts of the experiemntal program at the MoNA facility. Most of the Collaboration member institutions are primarily undergraduate schools. Undergraduates helped construct and test MoNA. They continue to participate in experiments during runs and through data analysis.

The Role of Undergraduate students

The physical characteristics and performance of MoNA were not the only things carefully considered by the collaboration. From the outset, several goals for the education of undergraduate students were identified: How can these students be continually and effectively involved in forefront research? What are the benefits to the students from this participation? What are the benefits to institutions and faculty members? When students participate in the experiments and when they work with the data sets, how can they evolve from passive watchers to active doers with the responsibility to get answers? The collaboration has addressed this challenge by creating intensive summer sessions designed for undergraduates, encouraging students to participate in all phases of experiments, holding several meetings a year that include undergraduate participants, and employing information

  1. ^ B. Luther et al., Nucl. Instr. And Methods A505, 33 (2003)
  2. ^ T. Baumann et al., Nucl. Instr. And Methods A543, 517 (2005)
  3. ^ V. Zelevinsky and A. Volya, AIP Conf. Proc. 819, 493 (2006)
  4. ^ S. Prestemon et al., IEEE Trans. Appl. Supercond. 11, 1721 (2001)
  5. ^ J. Toth et al., IEEE Trans. Appl. Supercond. 12, 341 (2002)
  6. ^ M. B. Bird et al., IEEE Trans. Appl. Supercond. 14, 564 (2004)
  7. ^ D. Bazin et al., Nucl. Instr. and Meth. B 204, 629 (2003)
  8. ^ R. H. Howes et al., American Journal of Physics 73, 122 (2005)