Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/BMWSAAB
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is the current revision of this page, as edited by Caulde (talk | contribs) at 10:27, 11 May 2008 (→Discussion: c). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.Revision as of 10:27, 11 May 2008 by Caulde (talk | contribs) (→Discussion: c)
(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
- The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a request for adminship that did not succeed. Please do not modify it.
FINAL (0/1/0); closed per WP:SNOW by SynergeticMaggot (talk) 10:22, 11 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
BMWSAAB (talk · contribs) - Making successful edits BMWSAAB (talk) 09:06, 5 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here:
Questions for the candidate
[edit]Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve Wikipedia as an administrator. It is recommended that you answer these optional questions to provide guidance for participants:
- 1. What admin work do you intend to take part in?
- A: I would like to help new users and delete vandal pages to keep wikipedia tidy.
- 2. What are your best contributions to Wikipedia, and why?
- A:My best contribs were to the Emily Osment article, the Fletcher O'Leary article, Ashley Tisdale article. On these articles i corrected spelling mistakes, adding infobox and adding refs.
- 3. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or have other users caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
- A: Well, to think of it, no if I did I would handle it calmly.
General comments
[edit]- See BMWSAAB's edit summary usage with mathbot's tool. For the edit count, see the talk page.
- Links for BMWSAAB: BMWSAAB (talk · contribs · deleted · count · AfD · logs · block log · lu · rfar · spi)
Please keep discussion constructive and civil. If you are unfamiliar with the nominee, please thoroughly review Special:Contributions/BMWSAAB before commenting.
Discussion
[edit]- (Should this have been re-transcluded - BMWSAAB appeared to remove it from the main RfA page?) Anyway, would recommend immediate withdrawal; this RfA will not pass due to a lack of any edits. Consider reading User:Dlohcierekim/On_RfA#Snowball for advice and you may find entering adoption helpful. Regards, EJF (talk) 10:23, 11 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- It's been closed. Regarding transclusion, I think they made a mistake and didn't know how to translcude properly. Rudget (Help?) 10:27, 11 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support
[edit]Oppose
[edit]- You have no edits outside this request. Rudget (Help?) 09:40, 11 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral
[edit]- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the talk page of either this nomination or the nominated user). No further edits should be made to this page.