User talk:90.196.3.244

Welcome!

Interested in becoming a regular contributor to Wikipedia? Create an account!

Your IP address, 90.196.3.244, is registered to BSkyB Broadband, Easynet Ltd, an Internet service provider through which multiple users may connect to the Internet via proxy, so you may receive messages on this page that were not intended for you.

To have your own user pages, keep track of articles you've edited in a watchlist, and have access to a few other special features, please consider registering an account! It's fast and free.

Review contributions carefully if blocking this IP address or reverting its contributions. If a block is needed, administrators should consider a soft block using Template:Anonblock.

If you are autoblocked repeatedly, contact your Internet service provider or network administrator and request it contact Wikimedia's XFF project about enabling X-Forwarded-For HTTP headers on its proxy servers so that blocks will affect only the intended user. In response to vandalism from this IP address, abuse reports may be sent to its network administrator for investigation.

Network administrators, to monitor this IP address for vandalism, can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format.

Dave

So, was Bhagt Kabir a meat eater or a vegetarian ?

What Bhaghat Farid a Vegetarian? WEre there not contributions to Sri Guru Granth Sahib ji from a leatherworker? Also a butcher?

Try not to be biased!

--Sikh-history (talk) 12:59, 5 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

your vandalism

This is your reference (cited by you) in Guru Nanak Dev.[1]. This is what the same site defines SIVA as [2] (siva is cosmic energy and sakti is essence of reality). It is the same as was defined in article Deh Shiva Var Mohe

You are making disruptive edits to Bhindranwale. Also you have done a lot of vandalism on other pages.

Further you deleted valid links from Dasam Granth and replaced with a site that is not a reliable source, much less not even in English. And it does not even define the position of Siva. I am reminding you , that deh siva var mohe is part of Chandi charitar and not ''Up avtaar. There is no seperate chapter on Shiva. It is a small part of Chaubis Avtaar, narrating tales of buddha, brahma, krishna and host of others.(24 in total and shiva being one of them.) chaubis avtaar has no relation with chandi charitar (which includes deh siva). Also while narrating these tales, the author mentions various shortcomings of these gods, such as lust, ego etc. and narrates they are not real gods, but mere mortals with extra powers and not to be worshipped.[3].(This link is for your refrence.For further studies, you need translated dasam granth from a person of eminence with high knowledge)

You are purposedly making disruptive edits, probably to harrass me, as is evident from your edit behaviour.Next time you make a disruptive edit, you will be definitly reported by me.Ajjay (talk) 14:35, 24 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 02:36, 25 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Edit wars

Hi, instead of indulging in edit wars, please try the dispute resolution process. utcursch | talk 13:23, 25 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Well because of you, i almost left wikipedia. But decided not to. I think you are in a fighting mode, but that does not matter. What matters is that you stop disruptive edits.

And by the way, you did a great job by calling me a fundamentalist. That gives me more reason to neutralise Bhindranwale article. You hit me below the belt, and got success too. i know the reason you are making edits to so many aticles, which incidentally have contributions by me. But now you watch out Bhindranwale article, it does not matter what you do to other articles, it won't affect me now. I have a whole collection of history on Bhindranwale, which i am going to find and put it too good use.Ajjay (talk) 13:33, 25 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hey if your not a fundy? Then why the fascination with Bhindranwale who clearly was one ? It doesn't quite add up does it??

What is your problem?

You are making disruptive edits to 'deh siva' article. why are you doing this? You are not willing to disscuss on article talk page. You are deleting refrences from the article, and you delete the refrence cited originally by you. You accuse me of being politically motivated and fundamentalist and blah blah... And you are still not blocked by adm. inspite of so many reports. You got some inner ace up your sleeve??Ajjay (talk) 18:23, 25 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I guess my problem is...."You don't get it do you ?"

March 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Hinduism and Sikhism, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. abf /talk to me/ 13:51, 26 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Discuss first

You are prone to making a lot of edits, without disscussion. Also you are involved in disscussing my edits on the talk pages of other editors. This is of no use and is bad ethics. Kindly, discuss with me any edits you want to make, which you think conflicts with my edit. You are welcome. But unless you discuss, on the article talk page, your edits will be simply reverted. And please see that websites and blogs are not reliable sources, unless they are of highly scholarly nature by established historians/philosphers. Please see wiki policy on citing sources [4]ThanksAjjay (talk) 14:21, 26 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding Vegetarianism in Sikhism

This would be of help.[5]. Take time to read all of it. thanksAjjay (talk) 14:37, 26 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

dude you need a chill pill

spend some time with your girlfriend (if you have one), that should cool you down .ThanksAjjay (talk) 09:43, 28 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 09:55, 28 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

hi,please don't revert cited material from reliable sources. As is evident from your recent edits. thanksAjjay (talk) 08:26, 29 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I JH —Preceding unsigned comment added by Pavlen666 (talk • contribs) 11:45, 29 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

So this was you.

Hello

Hello Ajay, Would you like to help and contribute to an page that is supposed to be made its called, Insights into Sikhism. Its about an Jew named Hari Nam Singh Khalsa who became an Sikh and appears on T.V. everyday and pursues others. and the funny thing is he doesnt know how to speak Punjabi or Gurmukhi and has no idea of Punjabi Language perhaps you would be intrested in contributing heres an start [[6]]. --UNikesh (talk) 06:30, 28 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It is kundalini yoga ?????. Nice work he seems to be doing. About the article, i think it has nothing to do with insights to Sikhism, it more like a lifstyle issue. Thanks anyways Ajjay (talk) 09:12, 28 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No, Ajay it about teachings in all fields about Sikhism. Its all in english though you know those white people who convert to Sikhism and only speak English or their own Language like Hibrew check it out Ajay the link is up --UNikesh (talk) 17:30, 28 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I am unable to help! Sorry to disappoint you. Also i have an instinct that you are already member of wiki, and this account is just a sock, don't get upset, just a hunchAjjay (talk) 17:45, 28 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit in bhindranwale

Don't remove any cited material, by terming it ambigious, without discussing on talk page. Ok ,this can get you blockedAjjay (talk) 12:11, 29 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

As I remember you have had 2 warnings for being blocked not me

Your edits in Guru Gobind Singh

stop reverting cited material. as has already been pointed in Talk, the cause of death is same in both references.You are reverting material without having a discussion, and failing to see the reason.Ajjay (talk) 12:19, 29 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You are reverting cited material not me

please see discussion page for admin to judge, thanks

Your reverts in bhindranwale

Stop reverting well sourced material in the article. Further your adding "He was anti-social..' amounts to Vandalism. If you want to remove something, you can discuss on talk page.Ajjay (talk) 18:22, 29 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Its not my fault he was a bit hyper and had antisocial behaviour disorder coupled with the fact he was a bit dappy or any other related personality disorders with a propensity for criminal acts of violence. I read on a message board he received on-going treatment at Punab college of medical sciences but unfortunately the treatment back in 1984 included happy slapping which really didn't help the poor chap, I blame the Hindus personally especially for 9/11 but thats another conspiracy theory

You have been blocked from editing

You have been blocked for a period of 3 hours from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. Anthøny 12:35, 30 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Bhindranwale

Perhaps you need to go through the ref. before claiming " His conclusion is not what you claim" It is his observation, not mine. Stop reverting cited material.Ajjay (talk) 06:07, 31 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You need to improve your level of English and General comprehension Ajjay, did you take note of the warning from Stifle ?

Your recent edits

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 17:50, 31 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

March 2008

Hi, the recent edit you made to User talk:SineBot has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. ·Add§hore· ^Talk/_Cont 18:29, 31 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The recent edit you made to User talk:SineBot constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thanks. ·Add§hore· ^Talk/_Cont 18:30, 31 March 2008 (UTC))[reply]

April 2008

Please stop. If you continue to blank out or delete portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did to Neo-fascism and religion, you will be blocked from editing. - Ricksal0224 (talk) 01:11, 1 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder, as you did to Neo-fascism and Religion. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Relata refero (disp.) 18:14, 1 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

This is the only warning you will recieve. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Khalistan. ·Add§hore· ^Talk/_Cont 20:05, 1 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Additionally, please note that anonymous editors do not have the right to remove warnings from the pages associated with their IP addresses, regardless of whether the warnings pertain to you personally or not. Such removal may also be considered disruption. —C.Fred (talk) 04:25, 3 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Reverted your removal of warnings once. Please don't do it again. --Relata refero (disp.) 08:36, 3 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for Disruptive editing. Please stop. You're welcome to make useful contributions after the block expires. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. Pastordavid (talk) 15:55, 8 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

.

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Khalistan movement, you will be blocked from editing. Gary King (talk) 08:32, 10 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.