Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/FUCKUP
Appearance
- FUCKUP (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
(Relatively) procedural nom per discussion on the talk page. Nothing significant or notable for this subject to deserve its own article. Already mentioned in The Illuminatus! Trilogy. -FrankTobia (talk) 23:44, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
- Delete Non-Notable.--RyRy5 (talk ♠ wikify) 01:50, 2 May 2008 (UTC)
- Merge to The_Illuminatus!_Trilogy? daveh4h 05:49, 2 May 2008 (UTC)
- Er... I wonder what the likelihood of someone looking this up and expecting a computer are...If it were my call, I'd redirect this to error. --UsaSatsui (talk) 10:49, 2 May 2008 (UTC)
- Or redirect to...My userpage! (kidding, kidding...) daveh4h 16:28, 2 May 2008 (UTC)
- Delete - per WP:FICT#Elements of Fiction. No coverage in secondary sources. Tnxman307 (talk) 14:43, 2 May 2008 (UTC)
- Delete I'm completely guessing the percentages here but I would say that, with a margin of error of ±1%, 99% of all edits immediately following a Wikipedia search for FUCKUP will be some silly vandalism. I think someone just read the book and found the name of the computer very amusing and decided to write an article about it. The fictional computer is non-notable. SWik78 (talk • contribs) 14:52, 2 May 2008 (UTC)