User talk:Zalgo
| This is a Wikipedia user talk page. This is not an encyclopedia article or the talk page for an encyclopedia article. If you find this page on any site other than Wikipedia, you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated and that the user whom this page is about may have no personal affiliation with any site other than Wikipedia. The original talk page is located at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Zalgo. |
Signpost updated for April 21st, 2008.
 |
|---|
|
| ||
| Volume 4, Issue 17 | 21 April 2008 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| |
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 16:28, 25 April 2008 (UTC)
Peg Entwistle
Hi. Thanks for helping with what's been going on in the last hour or so. All this came about within minutes after I posted on another website some comments critical of another writer's article about Peg Entwistle. I had mentioned I was a contributor to the Entwistle Wiki page. The person (s) who started changing and removing many of my edits also copied a portion of my article from the other site and created a "Disclaimer" on Entwistle's Wiki. The "Disclaimer" was a paragraph from the article on the other site, taken out of context, and then included on Wiki to humiliated me. I would never edit Wiki with the style or content I at times use on other, less professional sites--namely, sites where passion and emotion are expressed.
Thank you. James Zeruk Jr —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jameszerukjr (talk • contribs) 20:40, 25 April 2008 (UTC)
Hi, I believe a script of yours may have misidentified an edit made to List of states with nuclear weapons. An edit summary was provided and the edit was indeed constructive. Thanks, --68.72.46.218 (talk) 02:46, 26 April 2008 (UTC)
- Based on your talk page, I assume the script is still giving trouble. I'm going to go ahead and fix my edit again. Good luck trying to get it to work :) --68.72.46.218 (talk) 03:05, 26 April 2008 (UTC)
Text of Order Update
I changed the text for a couple of reasons: 1) the currently viewed version has some errors in it when compared to the original as pictured in the citation. 2) the format I chose was to mirror the exact text for those who have a historical interest in how it was written, line-by-line. I apologize if I'm a little slow in getting it all doucmented and formated correctly, but this is my first effort to edit something that I know to be (slightly) inaccurate. When I getmy signature and other administrative links established, I'll return to submit them as well.
How is adding a external link title "unconstructive" ? 68.39.174.238 (talk) 02:55, 26 April 2008 (UTC)
You are incorrect! My changes are not vandalism as quoted from the Wikipedia definition: "Any good-faith effort to improve the encyclopedia, even if misguided or ill-considered, is not vandalism. Even harmful edits that are not explicitly made in bad faith are not considered vandalism." Know your rules before you "referee" someone else.
What on earth??!!!
MR. CREAM, this is VASCO from Portugal
Do you mind explaining your modus operandi, regarding reverting my hard work on ANGULO, CAÑIZARES AND ALBELDA (spanish footballers), saying it appeared vandalism and was unconstructive. I referenced everything...
Hoping to hear from you, VASCO AMARAL - --217.129.67.28 (talk) 03:03, 26 April 2008 (UTC)
Cheers!
Hi there CREAM, VASCO on the talk again.
False positive, happens to the best. Have a great weekend, from Portugal!!
VASCO AMARAL - --217.129.67.28 (talk) 03:09, 26 April 2008 (UTC)
careful!
This revert was improper; I've restored. —Steve Summit (talk) 03:41, 26 April 2008 (UTC)
Vandalism (MU330)
Oh, I reverted to a vandalized version. Shows what I get for editing at 3 in the morning. =\ Nokmar (talk) 06:12, 27 April 2008 (UTC)
Image:Longcat.JPG listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Longcat.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Creamy!Talk 18:33, 28 April 2008 (UTC)
I've declined your report to WP:AIV and removed it. By all means give them a uw-create warning, but a test4 on top for creating one inappropriate page, then reporting them to WP:AIV for blanking the page (which most new users think is sufficient to delete it) is a bit bitey. Thanks. GBT/C 21:59, 28 April 2008 (UTC)
- Well, it's partly about the warning and partly about the report to WP:AIV - does Huggle do that automatically too (I've never used it, myself)? If so, then something's wrong - there had been no vandalism past final warning, so there shouldn't have been a report to WP:AIV in the first place. Do you chose the level of warning to give the user? If so, I'd suggest spending a bit of time getting back in touch with the various levels of create1, 2, 3, etc., and test1, 2, 3 - for first edits, unless the article is clearly inappropriate, then at best a create3 should be used, and most probably a create2. On top of that, two warnings shouldn't be issued for the same edit. Thanks. GBT/C 13:13, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
- Huggle does that on a semi automatic basis, it checks the talk page often when warning a user. If you want a copy of Huggle, i can give you and bypassing gurch's email --Creamy!Talk 13:18, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
- Thanks, but I'm a Mac person... The public face of GBT/C 14:13, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
- Huggle does that on a semi automatic basis, it checks the talk page often when warning a user. If you want a copy of Huggle, i can give you and bypassing gurch's email --Creamy!Talk 13:18, 29 April 2008 (UTC)