Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Track access controller

Track access controller

Track access controller (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

This article describes a role or job level at a specific company (London Underground). It is unsourced, and does not seem verifiable in this detail. As long as this company-internal role is unknown to the wider public (which the few Google hits do not seem to indicate), the topic fails WP:N. Tagged with {{notability}} since June 07; PROD was contested. B. Wolterding (talk) 22:34, 26 April 2008 (UTC)

• keep I don't see why the "wider public" has anything to do with notability. It's a position in a field of interest in which we have rather comprehensive coverage. DGG (talk) 22:39, 26 April 2008 (UTC)
  • What I was referring to regarding the "wider public" is some independent coverage, in the mainstream press or similar, which seems to be missing here; or at least I currently can't attribute the article content to sources of this kind. --B. Wolterding (talk) 23:06, 26 April 2008 (UTC)
• Weak Keep there are a handful of sources which could help source/explain the role this job serves within the London Underground. According to GScholar, it's also mentioned in this book, although I don't have access to it. I don't think it's a particularly notable job, nor do I think we have clear guidelines on what constitutes a notable job. TRAVELLINGCARI^{My story}_{Tell me yours} 23:47, 26 April 2008 (UTC)

• This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 07:25, 28 April 2008 (UTC)

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. -- Iain99^{Balderdash and piffle} 09:40, 28 April 2008 (UTC)
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. -- Iain99^{Balderdash and piffle} 09:40, 28 April 2008 (UTC)
• WikiProjects notified: WikiProject London Transport and Wikipedia:WikiProject UK Railways. Slambo (Speak) 11:26, 28 April 2008 (UTC)
• Keep or merge The main 'sin' is the lack of sources to back-up the content. Whether the article should remain stand-alone or be merged-in with one of the other London Underground articles is another matter. Either way, the content is worth retaining. EdJogg (talk) 12:42, 28 April 2008 (UTC)

• Strong Keep Is stronglt object to articles being put up for deletion WITHOUT prior discussion on the talk page. The only sin this article has committed is that it has failed to add any references. At the very least the content should be merged ... which again should have been discussed on the talk page.Olana North (talk) 13:19, 28 April 2008 (UTC)