Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sylloc Server

This article does not state it's importance whatsoever, or any kind of encyclopedic relevance. Tigerclaw81 (talk) 17:38, 27 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been added to the list of video game deletions. MrKIA11 (talk) 17:43, 27 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete couldn't it go speedy? LegoTech·(t)·(c) 18:54, 27 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete No mention whatsoever of any notability at all. Lazulilasher (talk) 19:05, 27 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Delete - Just forget the AfD, this article falls under WP:CSD#A1. — Parent5446 ^{(t n c k e l)} 19:32, 27 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Not quite. It should go to AFD, because we know what the article is talking about. The only question is whether the subject is notable enough or not to deserve its own article. Gary King (talk) 20:12, 27 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Does not appear notable enough to deserve its own article, per WP:N. I could not find any reliable sources that covers the subject. Gary King (talk) 20:13, 27 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy keep The article was less than 20 minutes old when it was AfDed and included {{underconstruction}} when they created it. The odds are extremely high that they plan to expand it. JeremyMcCracken (talk) (contribs) 21:42, 27 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]