Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sylloc Server

This article does not state it's importance whatsoever, or any kind of encyclopedic relevance. Tigerclaw81 (talk) 17:38, 27 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been added to the list of video game deletions. MrKIA11 (talk) 17:43, 27 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete couldn't it go speedy? LegoTech·(t)·(c) 18:54, 27 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete No mention whatsoever of any notability at all. Lazulilasher (talk) 19:05, 27 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Delete - Just forget the AfD, this article falls under WP:CSD#A1. — Parent5446 ^{(t n c k e l)} 19:32, 27 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Not quite. It should go to AFD, because we know what the article is talking about. The only question is whether the subject is notable enough or not to deserve its own article. Gary King (talk) 20:12, 27 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Does not appear notable enough to deserve its own article, per WP:N. Gary King (talk) 20:13, 27 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]