Jump to content

Talk:Search algorithm

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Pgr94 (talk | contribs) at 10:51, 15 April 2008 (Some missing points). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Search broken

Can anyone help? For some reason our wiki search does not return any results.

Even if I search for the exact wiki page - no results are displayed.

Last week it was working fine and produced the correct results. I have checked with our

Systems Administrator and had confirmation that nothing was changed over the weekend.

Thanks in advance for your help lenaquin@orbisuk.com


(This notice also posted to Talk: Combinatorial search) How much overlap does this page have with combinatorial search? Do they deserve a merging? Is one of these article titles inappropriate? Should one link to the other?

Derrick Coetzee 21:31, 4 May 2004 (UTC)[reply]


Combinatorial Search Algorithms are a subset of Search Algorithms; Combinatorial Search could refer to the search problem rather than the algorithm used to solve it. The two articles should not be merged or directly linked. Headstogether 13:47, 8 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

The mention of Grover's Algorithm, and quantum computing is somewhat misleading. It states that Grover's algorithm 'provides a solution' in polynomial time. It does no such thing: It is a theoretical model of a non-existant computing system. Maybe some day there will be quantum computers, but until then, an algorithm that runs only on a non-existant quantum computer exists only in the realm of theory.AngleWyrm 05:20, 10 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Removed the questionable sections on "SQL search" and "tradeoff search", which are subtopics at best. Bryan Silverthorn (talk) 20:56, 10 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Some missing points

  • relationship between search and optimisation
  • local vs global search, local optima
  • soundness and completeness of search

Pgr94 (talk) 10:42, 15 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]