Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/EM Client
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Martijn Hoekstra (talk | contribs) at 06:06, 11 April 2008 (close delete). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.Revision as of 06:06, 11 April 2008 by Martijn Hoekstra (talk | contribs) (close delete)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 06:06, 11 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- EM Client (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
- Delete Self-promoting article is written by someone involved in developing the software. Article was already deleted under previous name Comind. AlistairMcMillan (talk) 11:55, 4 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy Delete G11. If its the same article as Comind, its also a G4 -- Fullstop (talk) 16:43, 4 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment. This is an expanded version of the same article. But it's not eligible for G4, because Comind didn't go through AfD, it was speedy deleted under G11. —David Eppstein (talk) 17:20, 4 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong delete Not encyclopedic; written by someone with a conflict of interest. -PetraSchelm (talk) 19:57, 4 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: Fails WP:N and WP:RS. Otolemur crassicaudatus (talk) 15:47, 5 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.