Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lego-Prosthesis

Lego-Prosthesis

Very close to patent nonsense, but perhaps not quite there yet. Tupsharru 21:54, 4 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Does not seem to be verifiable. I have found some references to working models of human hands made out of Lego, but no indication that they are seriously considered as prosthesis. ManoaChild 23:23, 4 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, but BJADON the talk page "These facts are facts about actual facts." Robert A West 23:31, 4 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, hoax, there is no such thing as a prosthesis made out of legos and certainly Vietnam Vets aren't getting ones that say "What are you looking at? Wanna fight?" Xaa 23:42, 4 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Trying to think of a reason this can be speedied, as it's downright stupid to keep stuff like this for 5 days, but alas, I fear we must. Delete. -R. fiend 23:58, 4 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Oh, and before anyone votes to BJAODN this, please keep in mind that at least one admin does not count such votes as deletes, so if even 25% of the votes are BJAODN, the article could fail to meet consensus and be kept. -R. fiend 00:00, 5 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete nonsense. --Etacar11 01:22, 5 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. It's nowhere near funny. -Splash 01:33, 5 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. As a veteran of both Franco-Prussian wars, who relies on his Lego knees, I encourage this page's continuation. -~~FranzJoseph~~ 01:33, 5 August 2005 (UTC) (Vote actually by 68.48.216.25 (talk · contribs))[reply]
Keep. It's a keeper. BJADON!!! (Unsigned vote by 207.237.204.113 (talk · contribs), first edit)
Keep.First off how would someone from the University of Bristol even know what funny is? I vote we speedily delete Senior Splahes Vote For Deletion. Plese see article--->
Keep. Now this is what I call a medical breakthrough. -Splash 4:22, 5 August 2005 (UTC)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Splash%27s_Vote_for_Deletion_on_the_Article_Lego-Prosthesis (Unsigned vote by 151.201.136.93 (talk · contribs))

BAJDON this except for the Lego hand bit at the end which appears legitimate so Merge that with the main Lego article. 23skidoo 04:22, 5 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]