Jump to content

Talk:Judgment Day: Intelligent Design on Trial

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Filll (talk | contribs) at 18:20, 4 April 2008 (r). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
WikiProject iconCreationism Start‑class Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Creationism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Creationism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CreationismWikipedia:WikiProject CreationismTemplate:WikiProject CreationismCreationism
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Response section

I'd like to make a request for a condensation of the response section, given how incredibly outweighed the positive responses to the documentary are by negative ones. I just don't think it needs to be quite that long. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.19.232.115 (talk) 07:55, 26 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I would tend to agree, the current version gives WP:UNDUE weight to the Creationists's reviews. I would suggest that the Creation Safaris part be reduced to, at most, a single-sentence mention (they really aren't a prominent Creationist group), and that the other Creationist comments be compressed and the Nature review be given more space than a bare mention. HrafnTalkStalk 08:51, 26 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

What's up with the "Teacher's Guide Controversy" thing? That has DI POV throughout. --Wesley R. Elsberry (talk) 18:10, 4 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed. Neither the DI nor some unknown attorney are legitimate expert sources on constitutional law. Will move to talk until balanced. HrafnTalkStalk 18:18, 4 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Do we have any balancing material now that a few months have gone by?--Filll (talk) 18:20, 4 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Creation Safaris

I am sorry this section got trimmed back. I think they had such incredible commentary on the documentary.--Filll (talk) 17:30, 25 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It came across as the ranting of a non-notable element of creationism's lunatic fringe to me. Who exactly is Creation Safaris? I see them occasionally ELed on Creationism articles, but I have never seen them mentioned by reliable sources. HrafnTalkStalk 17:43, 25 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Peabody Award

The episode won the Peabody Award. That seems like a good thing to add. --Wesley R. Elsberry (talk) 20:51, 2 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Done. HrafnTalkStalk 03:23, 3 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Judgment_Day:_Intelligent_Design_on_Trial&oldid=203338656"