User:Android79/Sandbox2

Evidence presented by Android79

<day1> <month>

• <timestamp1>
  • What happened.

• <timestamp2>
  • What happened.

• <timestamp3>
  • What happened.

30 June

The following is a description of a revert war, 3RR violation, and blocking of Gabrielsimon that took place at George W. Bush. I believe it is a typical example of the kinds of behavior Gabrielsimon has engaged in during revert wars on policital articles. Gabrielsimon ignores the advice and complaints of other editors, makes small changes to his continually reinserted edits in order to "get around" the 3RR, and presents an illogical and POV claim backed up with dubious sources (newspaper editorials, blog entries). In short, he attempts to present his POV as fact and ram it into the article.

All times are UTC-5.

• 21:28
  • Gabrielsimon adds a poorly-worded, illogical, and unsourced "War for Oil" claim into George W. Bush. [1]
• 21:32
  • Gabrielsimon is reverted by Rhobite. [2]
• 21:46
  • Gabrielsimon reinserts the paragraph, this time with five citations, four of dubious quality. [3]
    • The sources: [4] [5] [6] [7] [8]
• 21:51
  • I revert Gabrielsimon and indicate in my edit summary that this ought to be discussed on the talk page. [9]
• 21:51
  • Rhobite explains why he thinks the paragraph is POV and unsuitable for the article. [10]
• 21:54
  • Fuzheado adds a protection notice to the page, but due to a bug or some other oversight, the page is not truly protected. [11]
• 21:55
  • I explain my problem with the paragraph: it is supported by highly biased sources. I include a link to Wikipedia:Reliable sources in the hopes that Gabrielsimon will take the time to read it and improve his citations. [12]
• 21:57
  • Gabrielsimon reinserts the paragraph a second time, this time with four more dubious sources. [13]
    • The sources: [14] (no longer online) [15] [16] [17]
• 21:58
  • Fuzheado reverts Gabrielsimon. [18]
• 21:59
  • Gabrielsimon says that he has added more citations to the paragraph. [19]
• 22:00
  • Fuzheado announces on the talk page that the article is now protected. The protection has actually failed to occur. [20]
• 22:01
  • Gabrielsimon reinserts the paragraph a third time. He has now violated the 3RR. [21]
• 22:06
  • Fuzheado laments his inability to properly protect the page, and mulls blocking Gabrielsimon for 3RR. [22]
• 22:08
  • Gabrielsimon demands that his edits remain in the article while a discussion as to their suitability is ongoing. He implies that those of us that are reverting his edits are not following proper procedure and calls us "jerks." [23]
• 22:09
  • Gabrielsimon states that he has reverted three separate sections of text, and that he has not broken the 3RR. This goes against the spirit of the 3RR, as Gabrielsimon has only made minor changes to the paragraph he wishes to insert into the article. [24]
• 22:12
  • I explain why I'd like to discuss the edits on the talk page before they go into the article. [25]
• 22:26
  • I tell Gabrielsimon that the new citations he has added all come from biased editorials, a fact he has either chosen to ignore or does not believe affects the suitability of the paragraph for the article. [26]
• 22:31
  • Cyrius blocks Gabrielsimon for 3RR. [27]