Jump to content

User talk:165.155.200.85

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Momo san (talk | contribs) at 15:50, 25 March 2008. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

February 2008

Hi, the recent edit you made to Traditional economy has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. - ALLSTAR echo 14:46, 5 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edit to Bengal Tiger (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. The edit was identified as adding vandalism, or link spam to the page or having an inappropriate edit summary. If you want to experiment, please use the preview button while editing or consider using the sandbox. If this revert was in error, please contact the bot operator. If you made an edit that removed a large amount of content, try doing smaller edits instead. Thanks! // VoABot II (talk) 18:25, 5 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The recent edit you made to Bengal Tiger constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thanks. The Helpful One 18:28, 5 February 2008 (UTC))[reply]

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Mole (animal). If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. · AndonicO Hail! 19:13, 5 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia articles, such as those you made to Talk:Hillary Rodham Clinton, even if your ultimate intention is to fix them. Such edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. OnoremDil 16:43, 6 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Pascal Feindouno. · AndonicO Hail! 16:43, 6 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edit to Mountain (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. The edit was identified as adding vandalism, or link spam to the page or having an inappropriate edit summary. If you want to experiment, please use the preview button while editing or consider using the sandbox. If this revert was in error, please contact the bot operator. If you made an edit that removed a large amount of content, try doing smaller edits instead. Thanks! // VoABot II (talk) 17:52, 6 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below.

Gwernol 17:53, 6 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, the recent edit you made to Pythagoras has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Keilana|Parlez ici 18:09, 11 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The recent edit you made to Pythagoras constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thanks. Keilana|Parlez ici 18:31, 11 February 2008 (UTC))[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to LASIK, you will be blocked from editing. Delicious carbuncle (talk) 19:26, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Hi, the recent edit you made to White hole has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Waggers (talk) 16:16, 15 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The recent edit you made to White hole constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thanks. Waggers (talk) 16:18, 15 February 2008 (UTC))[reply]

You have been blocked for a period of 1 week from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. Brianga (talk) 16:14, 26 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

March 2008

Hi, the recent edit you made to Eleanor Roosevelt has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Tiddly-Tom 18:19, 6 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked for a period of 2 weeks from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. Alexf42 18:55, 6 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to List_of_fairy_tales, you will be blocked from editing. Vandalism with obscenities, looks like you just go unbanned too.... BananaFiend (talk) 15:43, 25 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]