User talk:216.145.49.5

This is a public domain, you don't have any right to control any information. Information I provided are true and verifiable. It is the users responsibility to provide information that are true and correct and to respect others.

If you don't stop removing information submitted by others, I will submit for the suspension of your account for the grounds of violating the terms of agreements on use of this public site.

If you're going to insist on adding information, you need to back them up with reliable sources.

• "The prices of basic goods still went up high" - Inflation has been kept quite low
• "A very disturbing truth" - Non-neutral point of view
• "the Arroyo Government claims but wasn't able to support in terms of uplifting poverty" - Government figures, SWS surveys, and UN stats have poverty on the decline
• "...and creating jobs to the Filipinos" - The government met their target of creating a million jobs in 2007
• "most foreign traders" - Your reference refers to a survey of a sampling of business, and you'll need to make that clear
• "see's the Philippines as the most corrupt in Asia" - there are more than 60 countries in Asia, that survey included only 13

You're clearly editing the article only to demonize the administration and push your point of view. There's no fault in holding an opinion, but if you insist on adding information to the article it's always possible to present it in balanced and fair-minded terms. TheCoffee (talk) 19:26, 24 January 2008 (UTC)

Please see the updates on the site where most information came from International (unbiased) resources.

You're just posting the same thing without addressing concerns of neutrality. Also, copy-pasting text from other sites makes it a copyright violation. And the tone is unencyclopedic. And you bolded an arbitrary sentence for no apparent reason. TheCoffee (talk) 20:45, 24 January 2008 (UTC)

Do you understand what is a copyright violation? It was referenced to the actual author, to the study and I'm not claiming any rights to the said article. Quoting an article is not a violation of copyright, I hope you understand that.

I am not responsible for following your view on what is supposed to be the neutrality according to you. Neutrality means you must point out the positives and negatives and let the reader decide.

Removing my contributions is a clear violation of terms and agreements. Thank you!!!

I'm an administrator on the English Wikipedia, and I know what a copyright violation is. TheCoffee (talk) 21:37, 24 January 2008 (UTC)

Good then you know the difference between citing and copyright violation. Here you can cite any articles that are in a public domain or has the General Public License. So please don't tell me that I'm violating any copyright.

TheCoffee: I am requesting for your de-adminship because you have used your administrator power to lock the page before any arbitration. Administrators also has the responsibility to provide explanations to the actions taken.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_de-adminship

216.145.49.5 (talk) 01:59, 25 January 2008 (UTC)

March 2008

Your recent edit to Vinland map (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. The edit was identified as adding vandalism, or link spam to the page or having an inappropriate edit summary. If you want to experiment, please use the preview button while editing or consider using the sandbox. If this revert was in error, please contact the bot operator. If you made an edit that removed a large amount of content, try doing smaller edits instead. Thanks! // VoABot II (talk) 18:28, 24 March 2008 (UTC)

---