Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mathematics basic topics
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Woohookitty (talk | contribs) at 20:48, 28 July 2005 (→[[Wikipedia:Mathematics basic topics]]). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.Revision as of 20:48, 28 July 2005 by Woohookitty (talk | contribs) (→[[Wikipedia:Mathematics basic topics]])
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was no consensus. 7 to 4 is not a consensus. Woohookitty 20:48, 28 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
It looks to me that this was meant to be a list of redlinks to be filled in. If so, the purpose of this page was fulfilled a long time ago. As such,
- Delete Oleg Alexandrov 07:44, 23 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong Keep because it was created in fall 2001 - historical reference. There are a lot more pages that are kept for archives. I inventored the whole Category:Wikipedia category and I vote for keep! --User:Renata3
- Maybe one could slap a template on top saying that the page is rather unhelpful, and is here only for historic reasons. Oleg Alexandrov 16:17, 23 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak delete drini ☎ 16:16, 23 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep per Renata3.-Poli (talk • contribs) 16:56, 2005 July 23 (UTC)
- If it has historical value it should be moved into a museum. It is not much useful of itself. Pavel Vozenilek 22:55, 23 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, this is not in article space and has scant claim to historicality. It was useful, and it is not useful any longer. -Splash 22:56, 23 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep, it's not doing any harm. Kim Bruning 00:09, 24 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, no longer needed and of no use now. Dpbsmith (talk) 01:21, 24 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, it's not even very interesting historically. Nandesuka 02:34, 24 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Its wrong. The real deal is at Category:Mathematics linas 21:12, 25 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak Keep as per User:Renata3. JamesBurns 03:13, 26 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.