Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Window function (SQL)

Close in progress: An administrator or other editor is in the process of closing this discussion. Please do not contribute further to it; the result should be posted shortly.

More information:

The user who added this notice will be listed in the page history; the page was last edited by Just Chilling at 22:15, 11 March 2008. It is intended to help reduce edit conflicts, and to avoid closers duplicating each other's work. It also helps avoid a late comment being added to the discussion but not being taken into account in the close. If this page has not been edited for a few hours, it is usually safe to remove this template. However, if the debate is long, complex, or acrimonious, please allow more time.

Window function (SQL)

It doesn't give any information on the topic, very difficult to understand, needs more attention if it should stay on Wikipedia. Redmarkviolinist ^{Drop me a line} 22:17, 2 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

These are not arguments under the WP deletion policy. Do you claim that the subject is not substantive enough that it can become a non-stub article? --Macrakis (talk) 22:18, 2 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Keep on notable subject per WP:RUBBISH -Halo (talk) 23:40, 2 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Select (SQL) for now. The subject is valid but in general we haven't been writing single articles for every SQL clause and keyword. Mangoe (talk) 00:51, 3 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Merging with Select (SQL) is OK with me, but I think there is more to say about Window functions than there is about where (SQL), having (SQL), group by (SQL), and other Category:SQL keywords.... --Macrakis (talk) 16:48, 3 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Merge to Select (SQL) -- Whpq (talk) 19:19, 5 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Merge and redirect Creating a section within an established article can attract some slightly more encylopedic writing, as opposed to code and technical terms. --Nick Penguin_(contribs) 03:00, 11 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]