Objection to the consideration of a question
![]() | This article has multiple issues. Please help improve it or discuss these issues on the talk page. (Learn how and when to remove these messages)
No issues specified. Please specify issues, or remove this template. |
Class | Incidental motion |
---|---|
In order when another has the floor? | When another has been assigned the floor, until debate has begun or a subsidiary motion has been stated by the chair |
Requires second? | No |
Debatable? | No |
May be reconsidered? | Negative vote (sustaining objection) only |
Amendable? | No |
Vote required | Two-thirds against consideration sustains objection |
Objection to the consideration of a question is a method in parliamentary procedure of preventing a motion from coming before the assembly.[1][verification needed] It requires a two-thirds vote to be sustained and is not debatable. It is classed as an incidental motion.
This objection may be applied only to an original main motion, that is, a main motion that brings a new substantive issue before the assembly, as opposed to an incidental main motion. The objection may be raised only before debate has begun on the motion, as the purpose is to completely suppress debate on the motion.
This motion is not recognized in The Standard Code of Parliamentary Procedure and is criticized for being confusing. The Standard Code offers alternative motions for accomplishing the same purpose. [2][verification needed] Some organizations have bylaw provisions specifying that an objection to the consideration of a question is not in order at any time.