Talk:Control Language
I think this page, along with AS/400 object should either be re-titled with OS/400 instead of AS/400 or merged with the OS/400 article, which really needs to be fleshed out anyway. Though that may have not been necessary in the past, with LPAR coming to the AS/400 (iSeries), one AS/400 unit may be running multiple OSes, so I think it would be much more appropriate to clarify that the command language and object concepts used on OS/400 actually be credited to OS/400 the operating system, not AS/400 the platform. Tell me what you think... -- uberpenguin 14:03, 2004 Nov 18 (UTC)
IT IS CONTROL LANGUAGE NOT COMMAND LANGUAGE
Regarding the following IBM link, it shows that CL stands for Control Language not Command Language. http://publib.boulder.ibm.com/iseries/v5r2/ic2924/books/sm14/c4157215.pdf
I edited the context but wasn't able to change the title to AS/400 Control Language. 10:29 pm July 20, 2005 (Shahram T. Nayeri)