Jump to content

Local zeta function

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Charles Matthews (talk | contribs) at 13:04, 10 December 2003 (Initial page). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

In number theory, a local zeta-function is a generating function] Z(t) for the number of solutions of a set of equations defined over a finite field F, in extension fields Fk of F. The analogy with the Riemann zeta function ζ(s) comes via consideration of the logarithmic derivative ζ'(s)/ζ(s).

Given F, there is, up to isomorphism, just one field Fk with [Fk:F] = k, for k = 1,2, ... . Given polynomial equations - or an algebraic variety V - defined over F, we can count the number Nk of solutions in Fk; and create the generating function

G(t) = 1 + N1.t + N2.t2 + ... .

The correct definition for Z(t) is to make -Z'/Z equal to G; this fixes G up to multiplication by a constant, and we assume Z(0) = 1.

For example, assume all the Nk are 1 (this happens for example if we start with an equation like X = 0, so that geometrically we are taking V a point). Then

G(t) = 1/(1 - t)

is the expansion of a geometric series. In this case

Z(t) = 1/(1 - t)

also, as one checks directly.

To take something more interesting, take V to be the projective line over F. If F has q elements, then this has q + 1 points, including as we must the one point at infinity. Therefore we shall have

Nk = qk + 1

and

G(t) = 1/(1 - t) + 1/(1 - qt).

In this case we have

Z(t) = 1/((1 - t)(1 - qt)}

(currently something wrong with the formulae).

The relationship between the definitions of G and Z can be explained in a number of ways.

It is the functions Z that are designed to multiply, to get global zeta functions. Those involve different finite fields (for example the whole family of fields Z'/p.Z as p runs over all prime numbers. In that relationship, the variable t undergoes substitution by p-s, where s is the complex variable traditionally used in Dirichlet series.

With that understanding, the products of the Z in the two cases come out as ζ(s) and ζ(s)ζ(s-1).