Talk:Captain Corelli's Mandolin

Novels Mid‑importance

	Novels portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Novels, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to novels, novellas, novelettes and short stories on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.NovelsWikipedia:WikiProject NovelsTemplate:WikiProject Novelsnovel
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article has an incomplete infobox template! - see Novels InfoboxCode or Short Story InfoboxCode for a pattern.

Image

Is there not a better picture of the front cover? The colours are really strange and it's a bit pixellated (I'm a bit of a newbie and haven't worked out pictures yet!) Rocket71048576 22:25, 10 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism

The 'referenced' section was vandalised with 'that is a poo poo'. It's been removed.

Neutrality

I dispute the neutrality of 'beautiful love story'. The neutrality of this article is hereby under dispute.

I dispute your not being pompous. Your being pompous is hereby under dispute.

Er... I just removed the word 'beautiful'. I think it's safe to undispute the neutrality of this article... :) --Bookandcoffee 22:02, 2 Feb 2005 (UTC)

I dispute that it's a love story. There is a love story there, but to categorise it so narrowly denies the greater themes of the book. Corelli himself is but a minor character in many ways.--Alun 13:12, 12 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I dispute that its a story. As Aristotle says, a story has a beginning a middle and and end. This story only has a middle. Don't call it a story, call it a vignette.

How about Captain Corelli's mandolin is an historical novel (or vignette).--Alun 15:50, 12 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

A love story is simply a story dealing with love, which this book is, albeit amongst other sings, so why not 'Captain Corelli's Mandolin is, amongst other things, a love story.' Personally I would say it is beautiful, but I can understand why that is not neutral! --Silex 06:28, 6 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Evidently there is some confusion as to what this narrative can be effectively described as. I think the best thing would be to rename it a 'story' with a major theme of romance with other themes surrounding it. Although I do take exception at the idea that this story is a 'vignette' - the story has a beginning and an end as most people would agree. The fact that the beginning deals with the life before the occupation (setting the scene) and Pelagia's early life and that the end brings things up to the time (a rough denouement, despite its nature of continuum) of writing should suggest, by Aristotle's definition, that this is a story.

129.234.4.1 13:40, 11 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This reads like a (not particularly good) school book review.

I am no expert, but having just read the book, it seems obvious that the story first of all has a beginning, middle and end. Beginning with the Dr starting a history of the Island, little knowing the Island is about to undertake the most turbulent period in it's history, and ends with the lovers being reunited and the discovery of the original document started by the Doctor in conclusion to the personal history. But why would we take Aristotle's definition of a story anyway? By that the Iliad is not... Also Bernieres is writing a 'personal history' of the Island mirroring that of the Dr. And a theme I saw was of free will (or lack of), the only people in the story who had true freedoms were Hitler and the DUCE, the rest seemed to have the courses of their lives dictated by events beyond their control.

Love

Why isn't Carlo's love for Francisco and Corelli mentioned? Sophy's Duckling 06:06, 23 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

My best guess is that people are uncomfortable with it... Still i have contributed a little on that section, if anyone would care to eloborate further be my guest. The Minion Reunortis. 13:32, 3 December 2006 (CAT)

Citations

captain Aldo Puglisi in love with Caterina Pariotis the book it is inspired is : The White Flag by Marcello Venturi published in 1967

see Guardian article for info on relationship with The White Flag and with Amos Pampaloni, on whose story Venturi's book was based. Also Athens News article which mentions the documentary Are you Captain Corelli? [1] [2]--PeterR 23:12, 19 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Captain Corellis Mandolin book.jpg

Image:Captain Corellis Mandolin book.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 06:15, 2 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Title

My book is just called Corelli's Mandolin, not Captain. What is the correct name? Shouldn't we mention the alternate name? Benjamin ^{Scrīptum est - Fecī} 02:54, 1 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The title was shortened for the U.S. edition; I don't know why. --anon.70.23.178.7 (talk) 04:30, 8 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]