Jump to content

Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Redwolf24

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
< Wikipedia:Requests for adminship
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Robludwig (talk | contribs) at 05:56, 16 July 2005 (→[[User:Redwolf24|Redwolf24]]). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Redwolf24

Vote here (12/0/1) ending 01:17 23 July 2005 (UTC)

Redwolf24 is an excellent user; polite, helpful, and most of all, welcoming. If any user manages to be here more than ten minutes and not be welcomed by Red, then they should apply to the CIA for covert work, because Red is an expert newbie-hunter. Beyond that, he has hundreds of quality articlespace edits, many to articles on bands and albums. He's been a frequent target of trolls and vandals, and has conducted himself remarkably in the face of it all. He's bold when he knows what he's doing, and he asks when he's unsure. He has expressed a desire to be even more active with Wikipeida; Admin tools would only help his efforts. He's an all-around great Wikipedian, a source of light in the sometimes dark Wiki, and a good friend to all; support should be "no big deal" for this user. -- Essjay · Talk 01:18, July 16, 2005 (UTC)

I would be honored to accept this nomination. Check my talk page to see how I've been handling myself. Also, please don't shout down Boothy443 when she votes oppose ;) Redwolf24 01:35, 16 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Support

  1. Overwhealming, Enthusiastic, Unequivocal Support, And I am unanimous in that! -- Essjay · Talk 01:20, July 16, 2005 (UTC)
  2. Support agree completely with nominator. Howabout1 Talk to me! 01:27, July 16, 2005 (UTC)
  3. Absolutely. I agree with everything Essjay said about this fine contributor. The welcoming of newbies is particuarly impressive. --Canderson7 02:03, July 16, 2005 (UTC)
  4. Support - A mop would certainly complement that Vandal Whacking Stick. :) Sango123 02:34, July 16, 2005 (UTC)
  5. Support I am new to Wikipedia, but as soon as I signed up...bang, there was Red with his kind intro message, letting me know this is a living community. Keep up the good work. The more active this becomes, the better the resource. Ronreed 03:12, 16 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Suppport- JCarriker 03:20, July 16, 2005 (UTC)
  7. Not sure if to support or oppose, I don't vote neutral as a matter of some ludicrous principle or another. El_C 03:21, 16 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Definitely Yeah, I saw his contributions and it is nothing but a bunch of wonderful work of music. I sure do like getting some information. He and I both have the same work, I do work of music articles too. -- Mike Garcia | talk 03:49, 16 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Support, seems to be a very good editor, and is great when it comes to welcoming newbies. Columbia 03:52, July 16, 2005 (UTC)
  10. Support I've decided to support you, since you do seem to be a good editor and have made many contributions. Iamzodyourzodeveryzod 04:06, 16 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Support -- While I'm new, Red has was right there to welcome me and provide me with a wealth of information helpful to my WP quest. I'm also impressed with his contributions! Fallstorm 04:55, 16 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  12. Support - responsible, polite and hardworking, in my experience. Guettarda 05:14, 16 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Support Robludwig Good member of the welcoming committee, good editor, deals well with trolls, and his talk page seems to be a discussion hub for Wikipedians. Everything needed in an admin.Robludwig 05:56, 16 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose

Neutral

  1. Neutral. With only three months contributing, I am not exactly sure if you have enough experience on Wikipedia to be an administrator. Denelson83 04:29, 16 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

  • Kate's tool says 2008 edits, as if I haven't been counting down to 2000 and his nomination. -- Essjay · Talk 01:20, July 16, 2005 (UTC)

Questions for the candidate
A few generic questions to provide guidance for voters:

1. What sysop chores, if any, would you anticipate helping with? (Please read the page about administrators and the administrators' reading list.)
A. I would watch over RfC which seems to take a while in responding... I would open my talk page to reporting personal attacks, etc. I won't start the big stuff (VfD, etc.) until I'm a fully learned admin. Redwolf24 01:40, 16 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
2. Of your articles or contributions to Wikipedia, are there any about which you are particularly pleased, and why?
A. I am probably most proud of being a VERY ACTIVE member in the welcoming committee and Kindness campeign. As for main articles, I've worked a lot on Band and Music articles, fixing typos, unorphaning articles, history articles... etc. Redwolf24 01:40, 16 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
3. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
A. Well User:Iamzodyourzodeveryzod caused me the most consternation here. (Note: Iamzod has apologized now so I'm neutral to him. Actually impressed by his apology.) Before him I had such trolls as User:Redwolf24isgay. I think I handeled myself well. Anyways I would like users to report personal attacks at my talk page and I'll look at the user in question (as well as the reporting user to make sure they weren't provoked) and do what has to be done. Redwolf24 01:40, 16 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_adminship/Redwolf24&oldid=18941532"