EXTREMELY BAD

I remember reading this article a while back as a good article. I came back to it to find it: a) subjective or opinionated b) written like a magazine article or review c) written in an informal manner d) written so that it did not look like the other articles I finished fixing these problems. I AM KEEPING AN EYE ON THIS ONE! - PGSONIC 13:24, 12 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Broken Link

I found the 'home page' link was broken, but a quick Google search found an on-line version, so I replaced the broken link with the new link.

Looking at it, though, I'm not sure it's the same book. It's dated 2001, for a start, there is Perl but no 'hoc' and no mention of Kernighan and Pike, or Prentice-Hall.

Feel free to delete the link, but there seems no point in reverting to the previous one. I'll amend the article to emphasize that the 'on-line' version just shares the same title. Pavium (talk) 12:49, 10 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The original link is not broken, it's just that bell labs server going down once in a while. It's up at the moment of writing. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.122.181.93 (talk) 04:53, 5 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]