Jump to content

Wikipedia talk:Requests for checkuser/Archive 5

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by MiszaBot II (talk | contribs) at 06:50, 2 February 2008 (Archiving 1 thread(s) from Wikipedia talk:Requests for checkuser.). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Archive 1Archive 3Archive 4Archive 5Archive 6

I've been waiting for 2 weeks.

This checkuser system is managed by trusted check clerks and I really appreciate their all effort to make Wikipedia as healthy as possible. I filed a request on some suspicious and disruptive users to be checked but it past 2 weeks! During the period, I have had to file 3RR incident reports 3 times, vandal reports, and other RFCU files and to deal with the their(?) disruptive blind reverting. The below reports are just partial among the whole mess.

  • Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/3RRArchive63
User:Yuan.C.Lee reported by User:Appletrees (Result: Yuan.C.Lee blocked 24 hours)
User:219.66.41.150 reported by User:Appletrees (Result:24 hours)
User:43.244.133.167 reported by User:Appletrees (Result:Sock IP blocked 1 week)

I feel exhausted for this endless waiting and ignored by this system. Many reports filed much later than my case were resolved. How much longer should I wait for this result coming out? I know one of my files is very long but I've seen longer report successfully going through. It is so natural the report's length in the light of the user's long history of disruption. I "invested" (yeah, making the file really took about 1 month) my time to make the report but I didn't expect the waiting takes this much. --Appletrees (talk) 12:04, 20 January 2008 (UTC)