Jump to content

Talk:Dynamic bandwidth allocation

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Mange01 (talk | contribs) at 23:23, 23 January 2008 (Merge with statistical multiplexing?). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Template:Cnproj

WikiProject iconTelecommunications Unassessed
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Telecommunications, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Telecommunications on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
???This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Merge with statistical multiplexing?

Is Dynamic bandwidth allocation synonymous with statistical multiplexing? In that case I suggest a merge. Mange01 13:40, 17 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Dynamic bandwidth allocation (DBA) is not directly synonymous with statistical multiplexing. In the latter, all traffic is treated equally. With DBA, traffic streams can be given priority according to their service requirements. This article needs a rewrite. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Rjnott (talkcontribs) 13:41, 4 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Are you sure? I thought that statistical multiplexing also may be combined with weighted fair queueing? Perhaps the difference is that DBA requires some kind of resource pre-allocation and reconfiguration of the network, for example before each TDMA timeslot or each frame? But I don't know if DBA is a sub-set of stat mux schemes, or stat mux is a subset of DBA. I have seen an academic paper where they differ the two concepts from each other, but I had problems understanding the distinction. Mange01 (talk) 23:23, 23 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]