Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Crisis informatics
Appearance
- Crisis informatics (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
This appears to be original research in an undeveloped field. Please feel free to prove me wrong by finding additional sources for context and verification. Shalom (Hello • Peace) 03:48, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
- Why don't you explain, first, what was wrong with the two sources already cited in the article when you nominated it for deletion? You should also explain what steps you took in order to find other sources, a step that is required in order to make a nomination that is actually properly based upon our Wikipedia:Deletion policy, because from your nomination it appears that you didn't look for sources yourself at all in the 1 minute 44 seconds between this article being created and your nominating it for deletion. As explained in deletion policy, and in several other places including the Wikipedia:Guide to deletion and User:Uncle G/Wikipedia triage, you should look for sources yourself before nominating an article for deletion on these grounds. So: What looking for sources did you do in those 1 minute and 44 seconds? Uncle G (talk) 04:40, 21 January 2008 (UTC)