Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SUI Simple Unique IDs

SUI Simple Unique IDs

Delete article is an in-depth description of a non-notable software software package written by the article creator. Apart from a lack of notability, the article has WP:COI and WP:OWN issues. Mayalld (talk) 06:21, 15 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Mr Mayall, —Preceding unsigned comment added by GregorySchofield (talk • contribs) 06:53, 15 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I am not the creator of the software, and have no pecurinary interest in it. I did originate on the W3.org, and Amigaworld and elsewhere where I discussed the problem of having real unique identities available for net publications, but it is the work of a comapny (Lestec). I suggested to them the wiki as a resource for the service and volunteered to write it.

I did produce the images, and I did supply them to Lestec to use. I am not paid by that company, or have any holdings in it.

The fact is that wikipedia references, and references well a number of established identity systems, all having problems by their use of randomisied factors. This system is new, but also working at the moment. I am editing the wiki as support is be being fianlisied.

As for it being "non-notable", it is new and hence of little note - it would be a mistake however to conclude that it is without importance. It does exist, it is not speculative, it has immediate use that does not exist otherwise. Anyone, especially a computer user, who needs a ID would naturally first search the wikiepedia. I believe it is in the right place and service for uses for wikipedia.

For instance: Epub the new e-book standard mandates a unique ID for all publications (there are tens of thousands of such works that will use Epub format), unfortinately there is not an ID system that allows epublishers (especially small epublishers) to get actually unique IDs (indeed this is conceded in the IDEF documents on Epub which suggests 'making them up" - which is not viable).

The defense of the article is simple, it has a place amongst the other systems covered already by the wikipedia.

--GregorySchofield (talk) 06:50, 15 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]