User talk:Java7837/Archive Jan 2008

Sources of DH (your link)

Your link is to a portal to 3 versions of William Smith's bible dictionary - what exactly do you want me to see? PiCo (talk) 14:57, 11 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'm afraid I can't find whatever it is you're asking me to see - is it William Smith's Bible Dictionary? Perhaps you could provide a more direct link? PiCo (talk) 02:33, 12 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Assessment ratings

Hi Java: I was asked the following, and I as I am not that active with the assessment project, perhaps you can help: "Hi, IZAK. Since I've been away, Wikiproject Judaism has introduced an assessment system on the discussion pages. I just upgraded and expanded the article on Shalom Zachar, which was rated Stub-class and has no importance rating. This article does not appear on the long list of articles that WikiProject Judaism would like to improve, but it did need improvement! How do I go about getting the editors to change the quality rating and add an importance rating now that I upgraded it? Thanks, Yoninah (talk) 15:15, 9 December 2007 (UTC)"[reply]

Thanks, IZAK (talk) 15:21, 11 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Jephthah move

That's not how to move an article: please see Wikipedia:How to fix cut-and-paste moves for the right way to do it, if there is indeed consensus for the other title. Thanks.--uɐɔlnʌɟoʞǝɹɐs 15:45, 11 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion to Dinah

I just reverted an edit by an anonymous IP address that removed the same text that you removed twice earlier, deletions reverted by another editor. There is no consensus to remove this text; much further discussion is needed on the article talk page. In particular, you MUST provide some text from the 1985 book you mention, or a link to an on-line version (Google books, say) of the text, to justify the removal. (Please do not respond here to the issue of whether the removal of the text is appropriate; that discussion should continue on the article talk page; this posting is only a reminder that the matter is not resolved.) -- John Broughton (♫♫) 20:56, 11 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your work on Mosaic authorship

"Upset" is putting it a little strongly - it's just that prose paragraphs are the norm for encyclopedias and other forms of expository writing. Lists do, of course, have their place. Anyway, congratulations on all your hard work. I'll have a look and maybe leave some comments if I feel it's justified. PiCo (talk) 03:09, 12 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

E-mail

You may wish to enable your e-mail feature, so that private wikipedia related messages can be exchanged. Yahel Guhan 07:15, 15 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]