Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Defect detector
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by SPUI (talk | contribs) at 03:29, 4 July 2005 (being bold and speedy keeping). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.Revision as of 03:29, 4 July 2005 by SPUI (talk | contribs) (being bold and speedy keeping)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was being bold and speedy keeping --SPUI (talk) 4 July 2005 03:29 (UTC)
move to Wiktionary 203.98.57.97 3 July 2005 18:41 (UTC)
- Strong keep This article is part of Wikipedia:WikiProject Trains. slambo July 3, 2005 18:49 (UTC)
- Strong keep, as it is more than just a dictionary definition. --Alex12 3 3 July 2005 18:54 (UTC)
- Keep, valid topic, not a dicdef. JYolkowski // talk 3 July 2005 19:05 (UTC)
- Strong keep, more than just a dictdef, perfectly valid article. UkPaolo 3 July 2005 19:20 (UTC)
- Strong keep Should certainly not have been nominated for deletion - please do not refer obviously notable articles--File Éireann 3 July 2005 20:33 (UTC)
- Speedy keep. This is an important, notable topic in railroading. Sanction User:203.98.57.97 for bad-faith VFD nominations intended to WP:POINT. Kaibabsquirrel 3 July 2005 19:21 (UTC)
- I agree with sanctioning user 203.98.57.97 for above reasons. --Alex12 3 3 July 2005 20:52 (UTC)
- Keep more than a dictionary def. should be kept. Jtkiefer July 4, 2005 03:13 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be placed on a related article talk page, if one exists; in an undeletion request, if it does not; or below this section.