Jump to content

Wikipedia:Graphics Lab/Images to improve/Archive/Dec 2007

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
< Wikipedia:Graphics Lab | Images to improve | Archive
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Kintetsubuffalo (talk | contribs) at 19:44, 30 December 2007 (moving from Wikipedia:Graphic Lab/Images to improve as done more than 5 days). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

 Done Stitching Hogarth scans together

  • First image
    First image

Article(s):Marriage a-la-mode and the 6 subpages.

Request: I scanned the most massive and detailed reproductions of the engravings of Hogarth's Marriage a-la-mode series I could find, but I had to do them in two images per engraving, so I am requesting that someone "stitch" the images together and upload them (to here or Commons). The licenses would be PD-100/PD-Art, they are all located at [1]. 68.39.174.238 (talk) 23:07, 20 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Graphist opinion: This looks like a job for Hugin, but I won't do it today. Maybe over the weekend. --Slashme (talk) 06:22, 21 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

OK, its not urgent, so that's fine. 68.39.174.238 (talk) 17:23, 21 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I've downloaded the images, but there doesn't seem to be much overlap. That pretty much rules out the use of hugin. :( Also, "H6-1.png" seems to be missing from the list. —Ilmari Karonen (talk) 12:02, 22 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

OK, I had a look at the files, and they're a bit fat for my 56k modem. Sorry, I'll have to pass on this one. --Slashme (talk) 18:44, 22 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If I were to scan an "overlap" down the middle of the divide, would that work? 68.39.174.238 (talk) 23:02, 22 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Yep! > Rugby471 talk ⚔ 17:38, 23 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Does it have to be the entire overlap? My scanner isn't big enough to get the entire overlap, but I got a scan of ~¾ of the divide. Will that work? 68.39.174.238 (talk) 18:12, 23 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Never mind that, I've got new scans that have the entire overlap. They're in the above directory, as photoshop files. I'll convert them to PNGs later. 68.39.174.238 (talk) 00:42, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I've uploaded the first image to Commons as Image:Hogarth Marriage-a-la-mode reproduction 1.png. Could you please check the image description and update it as appropriate? (In particular, the author and date of the engraving would be useful to know.) —Ilmari Karonen (talk) 22:43, 28 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Excellent, I've added the author (It was Hogarth), I don't have the date, since this was something he (Hogarth) postponed doing, finishing and publishing several times. 68.39.174.238 00:30, 1 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

 Done SVGify a map (Croatian electoral)

Article(s):Croatian parliamentary election, 2007

Request: Create a new SVG map of the electoral divisions. The current numbering scheme and layout aren't necessarily required, especially since the copyright status of this image is evidently questionable. 68.39.174.238 (talk) 21:50, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Graphist opinion: I'll do this one --Slashme (talk) 13:06, 29 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

OK, I colour coded the districts, but I don't know where the islands belong. It should be easy for someone who knows Croatia to fix this. Also, maybe some districts have traditional colours? Also, the non-geographical voting regions are not on my new map. --Slashme (talk) 13:56, 29 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
This is a bit strange: see Counties of Croatia - the counties don't seem to divide along the same lines as the voting districts. --Slashme (talk) 15:16, 29 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
One other thing, can you include the other two nongeographical districts as the previous image did, or would that be no good? 68.39.174.238 00:36, 1 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Done --Slashme 06:14, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Perfect; added in place of the copyrighted JPG. 68.39.174.238 (talk) 00:32, 7 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Glad to help! --Slashme (talk) 23:13, 7 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

 Done Uzbek SSR

Article(s): Uzbek SSR

Request: fix a little of the distortion, as has so beautifully been done of late. -- Chris (talk) 22:37, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Graphist opinion: This ok? --mikaultalk 23:35, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Very good! Thank you! There does seem to be an image break, visible in the text, in the left hand side of the third column made by the folds. Is anyone else seeing that? Chris (talk) 02:29, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
(that may just be an effect of the manipulation software) Chris (talk) 02:51, 28 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Done, thank you, and please feel free to overwrite the original image! Chris 16:10, 4 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Sagredo svg
    Sagredo svg
  • Sagredo png
    Sagredo png

Article(s): Superlink

Request: Hi, this is a replaceable copyrighted map. Would it be possible for someone to create a replacement? It is exactly the same request as the London Midland maps done a while back. They have been done. They had exactly the same copyright problem. A simplified drawing (using straight lines etc.) would be fine. The colours can be changed, the layout can be slightly changed and simplified. The fonts can be changed. Many maps (including those above) like this have been done before with no problem. Dewarw 13:12, 28 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Graphist Opinion:

OK, if it's still here in two days, I'll get onto it (lack of time...) --Slashme 18:41, 28 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Or maybe not. Sorry: "Real life"™. --Slashme 10:28, 30 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

PRIORITY: If this image is not done soon, it will be deleted as it is orphaned/non-free/replaceable etc. etc. Dewarw 11:54, 30 October 2007 (UTC) [reply]

I gave it a start.—Cronholm144 22:20, 14 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, look good so far. Dewarw 22:50, 15 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I can't just copy it from here. Since it is subject to copyright, if I just make a copy of it as an svg then it will still be subject to that copyright. I'm actually not sure how different it has to be to be free of the copyright, but the point is that this is as far as I'll go for now. I'm sure someone round here has a suggestion as to how to proceed, or perhaps I am mistaken in my notion of copyrights. —Cronholm144 00:15, 16 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I'm just too busy to help out here, but I could save someone loads of time. There seems to be no need to include all the gray "existing" lines, or the yellow ones for that matter, and a straight-lined topographical diagram would be miles neater and simpler. There, I've just reduced the job to a 20-minute sketch ;) --mikaultalk 09:06, 16 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

How to make it okay for copyright:

  • Just simplify everything: use straight lines, for example.
  • Use a slightly different colour scheme.
  • Use a different font for any letters.

This will make it okay for use. Other egs where this has worked include the London Midland maps & the pdf, the Beeching II map, and the Central Citylink map (see archives). Do not feel that you have to take too long on it. I really appreciate your work, thanks. -- Dewarw (talk) 17:11, 16 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Not sure if this helps much. The station labels do work in Inkscape, but don't show up here. (??) I was able to make a pdf and a png that show them. The station labels should be checked - I'm not familiar with the city. SagredoDiscussione? 07:36, 2 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I re-did the text, but there are still some strange black blocks left. Not sure where they come from. Ill take another look if I get time. --Slashme 08:08, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

OK, couldn't figure it out, so I copied the route paths and labels to a new document, and put in the station markers by hand. Problem solved! --Slashme 08:41, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you. Excellent work! Dewarw (talk) 20:46, 9 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks! --Slashme 05:49, 4 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
By the way, note that the file size is now 11k instead of 67k. Vim is the cat's whiskers! --Slashme 10:53, 4 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Article(s): Eden Maine

Request: This is the logo for a band. It's already in .png format, which I did in my infinite naivete, but all that needs doing is converting the white to transparent. I know it's shocking in quality and resolution, but there's no bigger version out there. This is my first request here, sorry if it's a little banal, to say the least. Seegoon (talk) 09:57, 29 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Graphist opinion: Is this a free image? If yes, it's easy to fix. If not, we won't work on it. --Slashme (talk) 15:17, 29 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, what the heck, I fixed it; it was less than 1 minute's work ;-) --Slashme (talk) 16:40, 29 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

 Done Hoysala architecture

Article(s): Hoysala architecture, Today's feature article.

Request: -- Several of the images from today's feature article have ugly red text on them placed by the camera used to photograph them. I am requesting for it to be removed. aliasd·U·T 08:35, 1 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Graphist opinion:

I'm occasionally good for a little clone stamping or etc, and have fixed a couple of these, but can't upload them because they are protected. SagredoDiscussione? 23:49, 1 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
SagredoDiscussione? 03:31, 2 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is very good work. Pity about the protection, I suppose something could have been done though :( Its all clear now as far as I can see... aliasd·U·T 21:04, 4 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the kind words. I'm new to the graphics page, and not quite sure how the process is supposed to work for protected pages/images. I think any admin can upload them or redirect the links from the page. SagredoDiscussione? 00:34, 5 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I have gone ahead and put them across to the page and marked this one as done. They should be probably moved over to commons still though. Thanks for all the help Sagredo, your work is great. aliasd·U·T 08:21, 10 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Perspective correction (advice needed)

Article(s): MIT

Request: Hi, I'd basically like to know whether you think that [2] (1.2MB) is an improvement over [3] (800 KB)? Do you think that perspective-correcting the image was a good idea? -- Ddxc 10:27, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Graphist opinion: Personally, i think that the previous version was fine. The current tree on the right looks a little stretched > Rugby471 talk ⚔ 16:58, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I agree, image quality has degraded in the new version and the rhs looks over-corrected (leaning right) to me, all in all seems a lot to pay for a vertical roadsign and horizontal kerb. That said, a more careful correction from the original file might be worthwhile. --mikaultalk 18:42, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Reverted. -- Ddxc 12:31, 4 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

 Done Physics graphics

Article(s): Auger electron spectroscopy

Request: Basic SVG-ification. I know nothing about physics and can't check for any misleading addition, so please stick to the graphs as is. -- Circeus (talk) 02:58, 5 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Graphist opinion: Can't the user who originally supplied the diagrams export them in a vector format? --Slashme (talk) 07:23, 5 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

They are very new, and I'm not sure I'd get any reaction if I made a request. Circeus (talk) 23:51, 5 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

OK, I have about 10 minutes now; I'll see how far I get... --Slashme (talk) 15:50, 7 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Graph done, will now start on the diagram --Slashme (talk) 16:12, 7 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Out of time. Feel free to continue with the drawing. --Slashme (talk) 16:22, 7 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Looks real nice! Hopefully will scale a bit better. Circeus (talk) 17:57, 7 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Diagram done. Please check it to see that I didn't leave anything out, then we can sign this one off. --Slashme (talk) 23:57, 7 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

They look great, thanks! Circeus (talk) 17:31, 8 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

 Done Asterias dissection

Article(s): not yet but fit for Asterias and to replace png image in Starfish

Request: I have a problem with the fonts in this file. They show correctly in IExplorer but not Firefox. In the latter numbers are huge. Could a specialist have a look please? The image was made in CorelDraw and then ported to Inkscape. -- Lycaon (talk) 19:39, 5 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Graphist opinion:I'm on the case. --Slashme (talk) 06:00, 6 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

OK, please check whether it looks OK now. I changed all the text from "Arial" to "Sans": That should be a safe catch-all font definition. I also removed a couple of paths from the picture: Some of the outlines of the gonads were drawn as separate paths instead of just having the central grey area have an outline. This, and reducing the precision of the position-specifiers in the document itself, reduced the file size by about half, which should make any further editing much easier on memory-limited computers! --Slashme (talk) 07:34, 6 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks a lot. It looks ok now. Lycaon (talk) 08:04, 6 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

A little more Triestery

68.39.174.238 (talk) 00:54, 7 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Opinion: Done. > Rugby471 talk ⚔ 15:42, 7 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Perfect! 68.39.174.238 (talk) 18:32, 7 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

 Done Coat of Arms, Grand Duchy of Finland

Article(s):In finnish Wikipedia: fi:Suomen suuriruhtinaskunta, different coat in en-Wikipedia: Grand Duchy of Finland.

Request: Convert this CoA to SVG.-- 213.186.253.148 07:08, 6 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Additional information: The current image on the articel (In English) is incorrect per this. The request should be to create a vector version of the real Grand Duchy coat. This seems to be easily enough done by adding a correct crown to the current coat of arms. 68.39.174.238 03:15, 28 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Graphist opinion: I've made an SVG version of the one that's currently on there. Please tell me what should be changed about the crown. -- I. Pankonin (t/c) 03:22, 18 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Since I'm not the first person who asked the question, I don't know. I think his main request was that the completely erroneous coat of arms that's on the articel now (The one with the Russian eagle) be replaced with an SVG of the correct arms. If they wanted something more specific, they can file another request later with better detail. Thanx. 68.39.174.238 (talk) 00:13, 19 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Marking as complete. 03:06, 19 December 2007 (UTC)

 Done Tunisian coat of arms, second request, simplified

Article(s): Tunisia and Project template

Request: resurrecting request from anonymous user but actually using correct template Primarily SVGification, but also the correction of some errors:

  • The red circle at the top appears to have been cut at a strange angle for no good reason.
  • According to FotW and the Officials, the colors are outdated, all should be in gold.

The simplest fix for this is, the correct image exists at http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Armoiries_Tunisie.gif , all that needs to happen is to crosswiki and SVGify, but I do not know the rules on crosswikiing. Should this then be a Commons image? -- Chris (talk) 06:21, 30 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Graphist opinion: I have put the version from the French wikipedia on commons, but does someone know what the copyright status would be? In the meantime, I will now create an svg. --Slashme 14:11, 30 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

OK, svg started, but now I must stop for the weekend. Please continue if you have the energy. --Slashme 15:11, 30 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Scales & sales > Rugby471 talk ⚔ 20:12, 30 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I've now added the animal (lion, baboon?) so now we just need the ship and the motto and we're good to go. --Slashme 07:34, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I'm pretty sure it's a rampant lion, but that is funny. :) Chris 07:54, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I hope I haven't offended any Tunisians, but that tail looks very simian, and unlike any lion I've seen. ;-] --Slashme 08:44, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I've now added the ship; I don't really feel confident about doing the motto. Someone who speaks Arabic can help out here. Who did the motto on the Pakistan coat of arms? --Slashme 13:26, 4 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

And now I've done the motto. Unfortunately the quality is a bit low, but maybe someone who speaks Arabic can fix it. I'll put it on the Tunisia page and put in a request for review on the talk page. --Slashme (talk) 08:16, 5 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WRT the lion, could it be taken from a different coat of arms instead of the fr. one (Which does look questionable) ? 68.39.174.238 (talk) 18:35, 7 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'd be glad to; Which do you suggest? --Slashme (talk) 23:15, 7 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The Vector-images one is best, but it's copyrighted, so I'll suggest maybe modifying the lion on Image:Scottish royal coat of arms.svg, scaling it down, and then adding the sword. I'm not sure if that's possible, but the current one (The one taken from the French version) definitely takes some work to interpret as a lion... 68.39.174.238 (talk) 17:32, 8 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
It's what it looks like on the official government website. I'd call it done. Chris (talk) 09:04, 10 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

User:Bestofmed gave me the text of the motto, so I converted it to paths and used it in the CoA. I think it's an improvement, but I don't speak Arabic, so it's at best an educated guess. --Slashme (talk) 06:54, 13 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I guess this one is finished, so I'm marking as done. --Slashme (talk) 16:17, 15 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

 Done Om symbol

Articles: {{Hinduism small}}, and almost all articles related to Hinduism.

Request: See primarily Template_talk:Hinduism_small#Om_Symbol; the current SVG is slightly off and should be corrected so we can go back to using the SVG on the template rather then a JPG with artefacts. 68.39.174.238 17:28, 1 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Oppinion:

  • both are correct, this is script so it's a matter of handwriting. Should be left as it is. The present one is just fine. Chris 19:09, 1 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Both are correct, but the current one is an abstract, artistic interpretation of the Om, not mostly used in conventional representation in Hindu symbolism. The "Evidently the correct symbol" is the conventional representation.--Redtigerxyz (talk) 07:38, 6 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Here is the non-abstract one vectorized. > Rugby471 talk ⚔ 17:30, 6 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The first one is wrong. I have been a hindu for 18 years, and I have never seen an aum like that. Its rediculious that some people actually consider using it and would support it. It is totally misrepresenting a symbol. If you want proof, click here: [4] Nikkul (talk) 09:05, 7 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe so, but that type of harshness usually causes more trouble than fixes problems. 68.39.174.238 (talk) 17:21, 8 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

 Done Conditional independence (SVG'ify)

Article(s): Conditional independence

Request: Can someone please merge these two images into one SVG file? -- Ddxc (talk) 16:53, 6 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Graphist opinion: Maybe I'm being obtuse, but how should they be merged? Side by side? With or without space between them? --Slashme (talk) 21:24, 6 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Won't be needed. Applying {{Double image}} will do the trick. *goes to do so* Circeus (talk) 21:59, 6 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I did though make an svg: →AzaToth 22:12, 9 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Cool, thanks a lot! -- Ddxc (talk) 05:12, 10 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

 Done Geography of India

Article(s): Geography of India 1950 Western Ghats India Bharuch district User talk:BostonMA/Misc Archive 2 User:HouseOfScandal/Seria Ludo User:Mattisse//Maps

Request: There has been a discussion [5] on improving this image to reflect the geography of India.

Could you please remove the names of all the cities except the major ones (Bangalore, Chennai, New Delhi, Hyderabad, Mumbai, Kolkata)

Also, could you insert the names of the mountains (found here: [6]) and add the names of the rivers (found here: [7]) into this image. If you could make this picture with the rivers and mountains and without the city names as a new image, that would be really great. Thanks so much

This would elimiate the need to have two maps in the geography section of the India page. Thanks sooo much.

-- Nikkul (talk) 08:55, 7 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Graphist opinion: Here's a stab at it; It probably has some errors. SagredoDiscussione? 08:51, 12 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WOW! Great job!!!! Thanks sooo much Nikkul (talk) 16:42, 20 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

 Done New Kingdom map

160 px wide
163 px wide
165 px wide

Article(s):Ancient Egypt and others

Request: For me, these don't render properly at all thumbnail sizes, and I need to be able to use the thumb|upright syntax on ancient Egypt. I usually never have a problem with rendering, so I suspect it has something weird going on in the .svg file. I've done bunches of vector graphics before, and never had this problem, and I've tried tinkering with this file myself in inkscape and uploading scaled down versions etc. but nothing seems to work. What is going on? Thanks, -- Jeff Dahl (Talk • contribs) 05:38, 11 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Graphist opinion: The incredible vanishing region has a slight blur filter applied. I have removed the filter, maybe that will fix the problem? Let's see... --Slashme (talk) 09:40, 11 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Solved! See my commons page. --Slashme (talk) 10:10, 11 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I have now uploaded my version over the Wikipedia version. The Gaussian Blur filter in svg is extremely cool, but unfortunately it is not properly implemented on Wikipedia. --Slashme (talk) 10:13, 11 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Yeehaa! Thank you! (switching done=true) Jeff Dahl (Talk • contribs) 20:38, 11 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

 Done World Organization of the Scout Movement

Article(s): World Organization of the Scout Movement, Commons image so used on several language iterations: de:World Organization of the Scout Movement, it:Organizzazione Mondiale del Movimento Scout, sv:World Organization of the Scout Movement, vi:Tổ chức Phong trào Hướng đạo Thế giới, zh-yue:世界童軍組織 and zh:世界童軍運動組織

Request: Using a clean blank map, that captures all the little island chains, please make a much clearer map with sharper borders between nations, SVGify. A mockup has been drawn to ease the process. Chris (talk) 05:48, 12 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Chris (talk) 20:24, 12 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Graphist opinion: Thas has been waiting a while, so if no-one has done it by this weekend, I'll do it. --Slashme (talk) 09:27, 12 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'm on it... --Slashme (talk) 16:49, 14 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oops, in progress, but real life called. Please hack in my absence. --Slashme (talk) 16:58, 14 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Can we do a map without the Mercator oval? It seems distracting. Thanks! Chris (talk) 20:20, 14 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
OK, shall do. I'm back on the job, will have it done in about an hour. --Slashme (talk) 06:14, 15 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Please check the new version. The map which I used was a blank SVG map from commons which was divided along national lines, so I just went along with its opinion on which islands belonged to whom. It doesn't separate Hong Kong from the rest of China, so if there is a scout organisation there, let me know and I can update accordingly. There were also a few spots on the map which didn't seem to correlate with countries, but I'm sure the relevant scouts organisations can figure them out. --Slashme (talk) 06:51, 15 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
As for the island chains, the blank map I was working on doesn't have all the little islands north of Australia. If you can provide a reasonably good map of them, I could quite easily include them. --Slashme (talk) 07:04, 15 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
You sir are a great man people will write songs about. Clean ones this time! ;) Minor tweaks:
  • Moldova, Georgia, Armenia, Azerbaijan should be purple
Done
  • place red dots on Hong Kong and Macao, they do have Scouts, thanks for the insight!
Done (just big red dots, as the map I was using doesn't identify Macao or HK properly.)
  • Hainan island (south China, near Vietnam) should not be red
Sorted
  • trim all excess border so map is visibly larger
Not done. Inkscape didn't want to do this, so I'd have to hack it in by hand, and there really isn't that much white space anyway. If it really bothers you, I guess I could, but look carefully along the edges and you'll see some islands very close to the edge.
  • six non-Scouting countries lighter grey like my crude mockup-stands out better
Done
Thanks once again for picking this up, I know it had to be a pain in the Antarctica. Chris (talk) 14:08, 15 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
No problem, it was actually easier than it seemed at first. --Slashme (talk) 16:10, 15 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
You rock! If you could trim the bottom a little, to match the other sides, that would be great. Chris (talk) 16:31, 15 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Done, with many thanks, you are a true gentleman! :) Chris (talk) 00:53, 16 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

 Done Buñuelos

Article(s): Buñuelos

Request: lighten -- Chris (talk) 03:05, 14 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Graphist opinion: Now I'm hungry! SagredoDiscussione? 05:33, 14 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

That is great! Can you upload it over the original image? Chris (talk) 06:17, 14 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Done SagredoDiscussione? 22:34, 14 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

 Done Game Show Project icon

  • SVG
    SVG

Article(s): WP:TVGS

Request: I am working on an icon in Adobe Illustrator 10. I cannot save it as an SVG file without an error, and saving to any other format (GIF/JPG/PNG) causes adverse effects to the image. (The above image is a JPG, and it was created by taking a screen shot of the artboard in Illustrator — an odd way of accomplishing that!) The work is derived from two GNU icons in SVG (Image:Television.svg and Image:Nuvola apps edu languages.svg), so it should work. I've tried everything and I can't get anywhere. I uploaded the Illustrator file, and in order to bypass the warning, I renamed the file Image:Gameshow.svg with an SVG extension. Help! Regards, Twigboy (talk) 04:11, 14 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Graphist opinion: I tried to do it with Inkscape, but the current Inkscape only supports the postscript based .ai file format, not the current pdf based one. Your best bet would be for anyone who has illustrator to do it (which we have a few people in the graphics labs). > Rugby471 talk ⚔ 17:28, 14 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Sbmehta (talk) 16:19, 15 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Fantastic. Thanks!—Twigboy (talk) 03:25, 17 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Graphics_Lab/Images_to_improve/Archive/Dec_2007&oldid=181036536"