Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Wikzilla
| request links: main • edit • links • history • watch Filed: 23:32, 17 December 2007 (UTC) |
- Wikzilla (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Downtrip (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Code letter: F
- Supporting evidence: Wkizilla a user blocked for incivility, vandalism and sock puppetry claims to have many sock accounts [1] several have already been uncovered by users. [2] However after the ought right socks were blocked several more ambiguously named accounts surfaced. Accounts that none the less still continue about the same type of edits that the original made;[3] these suspected accounts have the same tendency to operate primarily in Military air craft pages [4] [5]. And have the same means of retaliation against editors who annoy them. [6].[7] [8]. A review of user contributions suggests a relation but lacks conclusive evidence as such, a check user would show if the suspicions were warranted. Freepsbane (talk) 23:32, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
Clerk note: Wikzilla is, of course, already indef blocked, the others are not. The two 70.18.X.X ips are part of a large /13 range in New York City. The other ip is also New York City. -JodyB talk 12:28, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
Confirmed the IPs are Downtrip (used for tag-team edit warring). 
Likely, based on IP range, that Downtrip = Wikzilla, but it's impossible to confirm based on IP evidence alone because of the age of the Wikzilla account. Dmcdevit·t 05:03, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
I noticed Freepsbane's message on my talk page so I came here. Both he and another editor have been accusing me of being a Sockpuppet virtually from the start. Freepsbane has a problem with Fourth generation jet fighter where it seems that there was consensus to remove a section. He did not agree with it. The entry was blocked and that was the last I heard from him until this evening. If you check that entry as well as the Eurofighter entry there seems to be one or two people who do not want to go along with the consensus.
I am new here but when almost from the day I started I start getting a couple of people vandalising my talk page and making false accusations I get to know the rules and a bit about my alleged master Wickzilla. Rest assured I am not that person. I honestly cannot think how anyone would come to that conclusion based on our IP addresses coming from the same very large ISP.
As for the other IP addresses listed above, yes I may have inadvertently edited not logged in when I thought that I was. It happens when you have multiple screens up. I caught myself once or twice doing it and promptly reverted, logged in and then added the comment again. I must stress those are accidents and I do apologize and now that I am more familiar as to how things work here I have been careful to ensure that I am logged in when editing. If there is a way to attribute my user id to those comments and someone shows me how to do it I would be more than willing to do so. Lastly, I would point out to you that I am not the only user that disagrees with Freepsbane in regard to the the 4th gen entry and there really is no need to resort to subterfuge. The consensus exists and he does not like it.Downtrip (talk) 04:46, 20 December 2007 (UTC)
After further research I doubt that I was 141.157.252.153. I do not recall editing Bell 212, JT-8D, or Dornier.Downtrip (talk) 06:04, 20 December 2007 (UTC)