User talk:72.86.14.75

Dear user 72.86.14.75: I wonder if you could provide the reason for reintroducing the material about the Steel Magnolia Bed & Breakfast. Use the Discussion Page at Talk:Steel_Magnolias. Do you have a source for the statement, which seems to me and to one other editor to fall into the "advertising" category? I suggest you turn to the WP:NOT#ADVERTISING section, where you will read: "Articles about companies and products are acceptable if they are written in an objective and unbiased style. Furthermore, all article topics must be third-party verifiable," There's also a section at WP:Notability which states "Advertising is prohibited as an official Wikipedia policy. Advertising should be removed by following these steps, in order: Clean up per Wikipedia:neutral point of view WP:POV. Delete remaining advertising content from the article." The editors working on this article would appreciate hearing from you, I am sure. Sincerely, GeorgeLouis (talk) 07:30, 5 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Dear user 72.86.14.75: Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Rob Bell. If you continue to add excessive criticism and potentially libelous material to the biography page of a living person without vetting them through the talk page for discussion, your changes will be reported as vandalism. Your most recent changes have been reverted.--Lyonscc (talk) 22:00, 9 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Thanks for the comment. I will do my best. Alexfusco5 22:18, 9 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

December 2007

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Rob Bell. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. This is important, let me deal with it so you do not violate the 3RR Alexfusco5 22:20, 9 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please try to discuss your changes and meet consensus or I will request semi-protection (which prevents anonymous editing to Rob Bell) Alexfusco5 12:33, 10 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.