Talk:Comparison of Pascal and Delphi
Hi, I started this page. It contains just the basic facts about what the differences are between Borland Delphi and the original language as proposed by Niklaus Wirth.
--Pascalman 20:23, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
Comments
The article needs work. The main thing is that sections shouldn't be a "question and answer". Bubba73 (talk), 22:12, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
Spelling error 'Comparision' in the article title - I would have changed it if I knew how to. Chris Burrows (talk) 02:10, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
- I fixed it by moving the article. Bubba73 (talk), 02:15, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
Get rid of the second person use. Bubba73 (talk), 02:13, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
- It needs to be less instructional, particularly the sections about making a program compatible with different dialects. I.e, Don't say " you should do ...", but tell what should be done or has to be done. (Third person passive voice). Bubba73 (talk), 04:53, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
How similar are ISO 7185 and Niklaus Wirth's original specification? Are they essentially the same? Bubba73 (talk), 02:23, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
- See John Reagan's FAQ: http://www.pascal-central.com/extpascal.html Chris Burrows (talk) 03:30, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
- There is a more complete comparison here: http://www.standardpascal.com/pascalfaq.html —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.102.198.58 (talk) 00:03, 9 December 2007 (UTC)
Eliminate first person too : "I have seen...". Bubba73 (talk), 21:26, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
In some cases the article needs to say which is which. i.e., "The functions "pack" and "unpack" are not implemented." - they are not implemented in Delphi. Bubba73 (talk), 02:02, 9 December 2007 (UTC)
Is it possible sections
First, I do not like the style of the three "is it bossible" sections - they shouldn't be question and answer. Secondly, I have concerns as to whether or not they belong in an article comparing the two versions of Pascal. Bubba73 (talk), 01:08, 9 December 2007 (UTC)