Talk:S-bot mobile robot

This article was nominated for deletion on 27 November 2007. The result of the discussion was keep.

TODO

Add complete references instead of direct links to journals/papers --nct (talk) 07:37, 29 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Add a section on impact on biological research with a link to [1] --nct (talk) 07:37, 29 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

A question

Someone changed the link to my user page and added a note that says that I'm a wikipedia editor. I think that's a good iea. But in the process, the link iself was removed. I would like to know if it is a policy or not, because if it's not a policy I think it doesn't hurt to spare a copy/paste to a potentially interested user.

Thanks,

--nct 21:19, 22 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

As no one has ever replayed to this question, I've changed the main page to add a link. Please correct and point to the related policy if this violates any.

Thanks

--nct 11:23, 8 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I've got an answer from IRC. I thus have removed link to my wikipedia user page.

--nct 11:55, 8 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

A note for editors

It seems that other people from the Swarm-bots projects are editing this page. It is good. But please keep in mind some things:

This page is about the s-bot, not the swarm-bots project. This is the reason of the EPFL centric page. I suggest creating a swarm-bots european project page if you think it is usefull.
When adding a reference, please link to the BibTex. If available, please also link to the ful text PDF.
When adding a reference, please link everyone that is present on Wikipedia.
Do not add too much link in the text, the reference section is there for this.

Thanks

--nct 14:29, 21 Nov 2004 (UTC)