This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw
Indeed. As it stands, the article sounds like it was written by a government operative. Has this doctrine been challenged before the Supreme Court? They are the ultimate arbiter of what is constitutional. —Nricardo11:53, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Okay, I see there are some footnotes which may be Supreme Court cases, but they are not discussed in the article, nor do they provide links to the court websites. This article has room for improvement. —Nricardo11:56, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]