Jump to content

Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Bason0

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
< Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser | Case
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Rlevse (talk | contribs) at 14:45, 1 December 2007 (→Bason0 (5th request): typo). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Bason0 (5th request)

  • This guy just won't stop. Copied from current SSP case:

xxxxxxxxxxxxx

Comments

As per above mentioned evidence, I request to block him/her as a new sockpuppet of Bason0.

See also: Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Bason0

  1. A comment left by 774townsclear on an admin's user talk page: [10].
  2. Use of the peculiar expression "is not/no relation with." Bason0: [11]. Cause5stage: [12]. 774townsclear: [13], [14].
  3. Use of the peculiar expression "citation/souce contents different." 774townsclear: [15]. Cause5stage: [16].
  4. Edits on Ban Ki-moon (almost identical reverts). Cause5stage: [17]. 774townsclea: [18].
  5. Use of the peculiar term "socket puppet." Nightshadow28 pointed out the common usage of the term among Bason0 sockpuppets at [19]. 774townsclear's use of the term: [20].
  6. Bason0 wrote at [21]: "i'm not socket puppet. bcz, i do not act like other guy. also, i did not discussion like other people. or protect my second ID i do not violation any rule. do you understand Sock puppetry mean? i already explain this.... your claim no relation with this. bcz i point a distruptive edit war. and my previous no relation. also, if you find my previous edit of Bason1, i edited a Neutral point of edit. but, he is non-neutral point of edit. he delete dokdo in some page...." This rambling resembles 74townsclear's below.--Saintjust 21:37, 30 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

xxxxxxxxxx

Sorry. Copy and Paste from sock_puppets board.
My engish is poor. please undestand my slightly abnormal expression.
Again, I'm not sock puppets. I didn't acting like multiple player. ok?
Did I WP:3RR reports repeatedly? don't tell a lie. I did report only 1 time 3rr warning.
just check time, bro. 3rr rule must within 24 hour period. IF i am a sock puppets, i use multiple accounts and 1 article and attack 1 user, pretend to different user, within 24 hour.
1. i am not a sock puppets. (Japanese POV agent user, make me as sock puppets, and want revert all my edits) you make me as sock puppets.
2. I did not pretending other users, so i did not abuse 3rr rule. i revenrt Japanese POV's edit. originally, previous edit is not made by me. My english skill is not good. so, i can't change whole article. When i find POV edit, i only revert it from previous edit.(little modified) you do not mistake that other user and i are same person.
3. IF i pretending other users, nevertheless It is still not within 24 hours report. did not misuse 3rr rule, too. Yearwaves3, Panelequal3, Rockgoals3 and Bason0's accounts are all dead. right? can't be a multiple user. and Yearwaves3, Panelequal3, Rockgoals3 and Bason0's edit are very old.(not 24 hour)
4. i did not use multiple and attack 1 user. I did not pretend to different user in 1 article, within 24 hour.
5. Nobody think Wikipedia is a videogame. it's your think. Wikipedia is not POV agent's video game. I did not create a new account after "killed" one.
change the channel, for user Bason0. maybe He and I are same country person. and want participation in Korea relation topic. but, It does not means i am a same person with him.
When he entering a participation, You(Nightshadow28) guy want block him repeatedly. If he judged by sock puppets from admin. His all previous ID are indefinite blocked. It's impossible he use other accounts. If he want participating edit, making new account is only way. but, you report him as sock puppets(even his edit are not violation). Just check Cause5stage's edit.(you report him as Bason0) What is problem of his edit? His edit is fine. you just want block him forever. (other accounts are all dead. so he can't pretending multiple user) It's unfair to him. according to cocker, He can't be a sock puppets. and in my think, his edit are not fabricated edit, really. I think your action is personal harrasment. He already punished by blocked period. Please be civil. WP:CIVIL.
Return to channel, Just do not push and make me as sock puppets. I didn't violation any wikipedia rule or vandalism. you must make discussion before report other user as sock puppets, try to make consensused edit. Why you can't do like that? You did not talk with him. You did not try to make consensused edit. report as sock puppets is your only response. you guy want block me, too? by same way? you want opposition user make as sock puppets and repel him, revert article. why? you can not make sincerely discussion. you didn't prove fabrication edit by trust citation. like your fabricated edit.[22](I checked your edit. this edit is totally fiction. just see discussion page. nobody prove cite and any source. vandalsim)
Whatever you say, i have right for correct the wrong edit. anyone can edit wikipedia. It is wikipedia. and It is GNU. you do not have right for repel other user who opposition edit to you. 774townsclear 11:05, 1 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Pleas, adminstrator. check my IP and compare edit or whatever. check reported user and me. I am not sock puppets, really. I really annoying this. i want show evidence from administrator. 774townsclear

Er, an event before the above-mentioned comment is this.[23] Probably, it can remove and copy to the talk page. --Nightshadow28 13:17, 1 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

no Declined. We do not perform checks on users at their request. Please read the instructions at the top of the board. --Deskana (talk) 13:26, 1 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Huh? I filed this, not the user in question. I see I forgot to sign the original submission, my fault. — Rlevse • Talk • 14:25, 1 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
If you are creating a new request about this user, please add it to the top of the page, above this notice. Don't forget to add
{{Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Bason0}}
to the checkuser page here. Previous requests (shown below), and this box, will be automatically hidden on Requests for checkuser (but will still appear here).
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.

Bason0 (4th request)

See Also

Hello administrators and clerks. I request a checkuser in Japan-Korea related articles. Although some "socketpuppeter" (this is his/her wording) is connected to Bason0[24] and socks, some seem to be Replayamong31[25].

User Account creation (UTC) Interested articles Evidences and behaviors
Referloose (talk · contribs) 03:44, 4 October 2007 Second Manchu invasion of Korea‎, Talk:Yeongeunmun Gate‎ modified Replayamong23's comment as own it.
Checkorder2 (talk · contribs) 16:50, 13 October 2007 Independence Gate‎, Talk:Yeongeunmun Gate‎, Talk:Japanese war crimes‎ similar editing to Dutyterms's, deletion of a project template and other user's comment.
Checkorder9 (talk · contribs) 10:45, 14 October 2007 Prostitution in South Korea‎, Talk:Japanese war crimes‎, Hong Sa-ik‎ probably Checkorder2 (username), behavior of avoiding scrutiny from other editors. indefinite blocked at 04:27, 21 October 2007.
Abovelarge (talk · contribs) 12:25, 14 October 2007 Liancourt Rocks‎, Jeon Myeong-un‎ similar editing to Replayamong31's
Yearwaves3 (talk · contribs) 16:22, 14 October 2007 Science and technology in Korea‎, Socotra Rock‎, Korean Buddhism‎, An Jung-geun‎, Yoon Bong-Gil similar editing to Bason0's, modified closed vote, clear account switching: Replayamong23 11:47, 20 October 2007 UTC -> Yearwaves3 11:59, 20 October 2007 UTC. wording (in edit summary)
Panelequal3 (talk · contribs) 06:40, 15 October 2007 Sea of Japan‎, Sea of Japan naming dispute‎, Koror-Babeldaob Bridge‎ wording (in edit summary), wording (in edit summary), similar editing to Leavepower's, 9 reverts at Sea of Japan.
Rockgoals3 (talk · contribs) 18:46, 14 October 2007 Comfort women‎, Image:COMFORTAｄｄ.GIF‎, Korean Confucianism‎, Military history of Goguryeo‎, Korean nationalism‎, Independence Gate‎, Kim Gu‎, Japanese-Korean disputes‎, Balhae‎ similar editing to Checkorder2's
Surehoped3 (talk · contribs) 11:28, 18 October 2007 Talk:Jang Yeong-sil, U of Goryeo, Taejo of Joseon, Kingdom of Goryeo, History of Korea, Jang Yeong-sil, Sung Kang, Daewoo, Hyundai, Gageo Reef He is indifferent to proper use of a capital/small letter[26], like a series of account.[27][28][29][30]

He likes to use not other template but this vandalism template, like Dutyterms and Checkorder2.

Wantsg5edge (talk · contribs) 14:31, 19 October 2007 Talk:Rain gauge, Rain gauge, Sejong the Great of Joseon He registered on the next day of Surehoped3, he has an interest in the Korean rain gage, like Surehoped3. And account switching on 19 October 2007:
  • Surehoped3 14:27 -> Wantsg5edge 14:37
  • Surehoped3 19:03 -> Wantsg5edge 19:13 - 19:15 -> Surehoped3 19:25
121.135.161.180 (talk · contribs) 14:37, 19 August 2007 (1st edit) First Manchu invasion of Korea‎, Second Manchu invasion of Korea‎, Yeongeunmun Gate‎, Talk:Science and technology in Korea‎, Choe Mu-seon‎ wording (in edit summary), editing about 1h after Dutyterms.

If you need more evidence, please give me advice. Thanks. --Nightshadow28 03:05, 21 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I added Surehoped3 and Wantsg5edge. --Nightshadow28 14:16, 21 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I added 121.135.161.180. --Nightshadow28 12:51, 24 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

 Confirmed, and also Stockbasis2 (talk · contribs), Boatangry (talk · contribs), Exactpush9 (talk · contribs), and Groudchtouch (talk · contribs). IP reblocked. Dmcdevit·t 19:49, 26 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

All socks have been blocked by Alison and Flyguy649.[31] Thanks. --Nightshadow28 17:18, 28 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Bason0 (3rd request)

request links: view • edit • links • history • watch
Filed: 16:07, 5 September 2007 (UTC)

Hello administrators and clerks. The previous WP:RFCU report is Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Bason0. The in-def block log of puppet master is here.[32]

The sentences which 221.148.48.231[33] (he/she deleted a talk page of Bason0 as own.[34]) and Dutyterms[35] (he/she is one of established sockpuppet of Bason0) contributed was removed by Marcus22[36][37]. But a new registered user named Studyhigh has restored it again.[38] This is a doubtful action clearly as sockpuppet, and Marcus22 also has commented the same in edit summary.[39]

On Independence Gate, Studyhigh has performed the completely same contribution as Dutyterms, too.[40][41]

Although I am sure that the above-mentioned proof is quite powerful, there is a fault in that a few contributions by target user. Therefore, I request a check. Thanks. --Nightshadow28 16:07, 5 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

 Confirmed. Voice-of-All 03:34, 12 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

 Clerk note: Copied from Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Bason0 (3rd) --Michael Billington (talk) 01:08, 15 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Bason0 (2nd request)

Hello administrators and clerks. The new registered user is continuing edit similar to Bason0 and his sockpuppets. I think that the application of RFCU in such a situation will be permitted.

The in-def block log of Bason0 (talk · contribs) is here[42].

If you need more evidence, please give a advice to me. Thanks. --Nightshadow28 15:26, 21 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I added a puppetmaster's line. --Nightshadow28 16:09, 21 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

 Confirmed. Voice-of-All 19:38, 21 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Dutyterms was in-def blocked by administrator EliminatorJR.[51] Thanks. --Nightshadow28 14:06, 22 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Bason0

request links: main • edit • links • history • watch • talk
Filed: 11:27, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
  • Code letter:C and E

Please see Liancourt Rocks, 2005 in Japan, Korea, Usan-do. This user has engaged in seriously edit war.--Watermint 11:27, 9 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

 Clerk note: Comment from the accused moved to the talk page. Please direct all other comments there as well. Kwsn(Ni!) 16:00, 9 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

information Note:. Please re-list this at the top of the page. Mackensen (talk) 17:49, 9 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This user is already violating WP:AN3, on Parangdo, Islands of Korea, and 2005 in Japan using some socks. It was reported by Endroit on the noticeboard.--Watermint 14:20, 10 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: I've indef-blocked User:Bason1 as an obvious, disruptive sock of User:Bason0. No comment on the others, pending the checkuser results. MastCell Talk 21:41, 10 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
i have no relation with those person. user:Endroit stop personal harassment to me. Replystay 10:55, 14 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

He made a new sock account. I have add new one to above list.--Watermint 07:57, 16 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

information Note: I blocked Leavepower (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki) for 3RR (1 day) this morning. Whilst doing further investigation noticed the similar editing patterns for 4 of the names mentioned above, and was going to bring it here and saw this is already open. If you require diff's please let me know. Khukri 14:41, 16 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

 Confirmed for all except Replystay. Socks also include Godsmodo, Nakagawa0, Locomotove3, Locomotove2, and Somalis1. Replystay and Nakagawa0 are connected and possibly the same too. Voice-of-All 22:58, 17 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. - the following accounts have now been indefinitely blocked for sockery & tagged accordingly;

Note that Replystay (talk · contribs) remains unproven, though probable, and has not been blocked - Alison ☺ 01:26, 18 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.
Subsequent requests related to this user should be made above, in a new section.


Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_checkuser/Case/Bason0&oldid=175058115"