Talk:Harold Wilson plot allegations

Credit where credit's due

Other than a general mass cleanup of this article needed, the allegations attributed to this 'new BBC documentary' here and on Harold Wilson were surely published in 'The Pencourt File' by Penrose and Courtier years and years and years ago, and possibly even before then in a newspaper. Anyone have a copy handy who can point out what the doc said that the book didn't? --Aim Here 15:37, 17 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I have a copy of The Pencourt File -- but don't own a TV, so didn't see the doc! Gah! However, will gladly check any necessaries if someone would care to give me pointers at what the doc might have duplicated. The 'newspapers' suggestion won't help much -- nearly all the reportage that came out of the Wilson plot allegations was either Pencourt's, or after the book. As I say, if some kind soul will give a precis of the doc's main points, I'll gladly play wiki-'battleships' ... Garrick92 17:58, 8 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hoax tag and Clockwork Orange

User:Rambutan has placed a {{hoax}} tag on this article, without explaining what the concern is. He has also done the same at Clockwork Orange (plot) and I managed to get him to state his problem there, which was that the article supposedly treated the Clockwork Orange plot as a proven fact (although I dispute this, and his complaint was more of a POV issue anyways, so I changed the tag there). I don't know what the beef is with this particular article, since the crossover between the Clockwork Orange paragraphs here and the Clockwork Orange (plot) article is fairly minimal. As an aside, the Clockwork Orange paragraphs mostly cover Wright's material, and it's not immmediately clear how much of Wright's work was related of the Clockwork Orange project that Colin Wallace was involved with, so I changed the heading.--Aim Here 21:00, 20 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]