Talk:Collaborative method

Business Start‑class Mid‑importance

	Business portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Psychology Start‑class

	Psychology portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Psychology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Psychology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PsychologyWikipedia:WikiProject PsychologyTemplate:WikiProject Psychologypsychology
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Graphic design Unassessed

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Graphic design, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of graphic design-related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Graphic designWikipedia:WikiProject Graphic designTemplate:WikiProject Graphic designGraphic design
???	This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Group Values

Hello. I realized that we can be more efficient in writing this article, if we listed and agreed upon some group values. Please do contribute.

1. Freedom of Information

Signed, 146.145.210.126 17:30, 6 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

April 2007 updates

I will be editing Collaborative methodologies and other related pages for an undergraduate thesis project. Because the project and pages are about collaboration, this would be a great place for us all to converse, please collaborate with me and provide feedback. --Parhamr 03:44, 15 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair play, you are making a decent job of this page. Just be careful not to inject original research or novel synthesis that might form part of your thesis but would be against policy but besides that mild suggestion - great job! --Fredrick day 09:50, 17 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Methods?

Why methodologies? Wouldnt Collaborative method mean the same thing? MidgleyDJ 09:08, 17 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Moved. :-). MidgleyDJ 09:20, 17 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Excessive lists

At this time there are sixteen individual lists. Please help convert the non-essential lists into prose! —Parhamr 18:53, 29 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I made some fixes but none were really outright rewrites as prose; it is currently 'ok' but not optimal —Parhamr 01:24, 11 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Avoid becoming a 'how-to'

WP:NOT#INFO—please note that editors should avoid turning this article into a 'how-to' —Parhamr 01:02, 11 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Learner type percentiles

The percentages given for the proportions of different leaner types (e.g., auditory, visual and kin) in the population are directly contradicted in the linked article on Kineasthetic learners. This article gives percentiles of 40, 30 and 30 percent respectively: the other gives values of 10, 60 and 30 percent. Clearly, one set of values is wrong. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.158.222.5 (talk) 23:47, 23 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The cited source for this article states she derived her info from "Myers-Briggs and other psychological theories," while the source for the kinesthetic article is a martial arts web site that in-turn has no citation. Wikipedia's policy of verifiability and guideline of reliable sources would lead me to believe this article's source is correct. Thank you for asking this question! —Parhamr 23:59, 23 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject class rating

This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as start, and the rating on other projects was brought up to start class. BetacommandBot 16:58, 9 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]