Jump to content

User talk:216.235.145.178

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 216.235.145.178 (talk) at 18:53, 7 November 2007 (November 2007). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

October 2007

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Girolamo Savonarola 20:58, 30 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

What did I do? sorry if I changed your pages unintentionally. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.235.145.178 (talkcontribs)

November 2007

Please stop adding inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Topiary. It is considered spamming and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Since Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings. If you continue spamming, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. TerriersFan 01:33, 3 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you insert a spam link, as you did to Fleur-de-lis, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Persistent spammers may have their websites blacklisted as well, preventing anyone from linking to them from all of Wikipedia. TerriersFan 03:32, 7 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop removing content from the article. It is considered vandalism. If you want to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.235.145.178 (talkcontribs)
You have been blocked from editing for a period of four months in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for spamming. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. east.718 at 16:38, 11/7/2007 16:38, 7 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]


This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

216.235.145.178 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

My contribution was relevant and legitimate

Notes:

  • In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
  • Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.
Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=My contribution was relevant and legitimate |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=My contribution was relevant and legitimate |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=My contribution was relevant and legitimate |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}