Jump to content

Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2007/Candidate statements/Raul654

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Raul654 (talk | contribs) at 03:57, 1 November 2007 (Created page with '{{subst:Arbitration Committee Elections statement|Raul654| Hello all. I've been an arbitrator now for almost 3 1/2 years. I was elected back in August of 2004. The...'). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Hello all. I've been an arbitrator now for almost 3 1/2 years. I was elected back in August of 2004. The reason I wanted to become an arbitrator was I was very unhappy with how the (then-newly created) dispute resolution process was working. In particular, Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Plautus satire vs Raul654 left a very bad taste my mouth. Plautus was ultimately banned, but only after weeks of unbelievably outrageous behavior that caused several good users to permanently leave. I wanted to join the arbitration committee to make it better serve the purpose of building the encyclopedia - to favor those who do good work, rather than bending over backwards to give 3rd and 4th chances to users who do not share our goals of building an encyclopedia. How far we have come since then.

In the early years of the committee, I authored many of the cases - not as many as Fred Bauder, but certainly more than my fair share. Owing to time spent on the other work I do here - as an adminstrator, checkuser, oversighter, member of the press committee, featured article director, and contributor to the encyclopedia - in the last year or two I have not authored as many cases as I used to. However, I have made it a point to take the lead on some of the more controversial ones (for example, Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Pedophilia userbox wheel war). I consider it a badge of honor that many of the trolls on WikipediaReview detest me.


I am not here for them - I am here for you, the editors and administrators. It was at my suggestion that the three-revert rule became enforcable. (I wanted to propose it as a principle in a case, but James F. suggested we do it through Jimbo. This was ultimately what was done) It may not be perfect, but it is certainly an improvement over the 100-revert war we were dealing with at the time. (And I mean that literally)

I created the clerks system. I think the program has turned out to be a very useful tool for the arbitration committee, helping to spread out the more mundane activities over a larger group of users.