Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Intellipool Network Monitor

Comment -- there are more articles about other companies that are somewhat like this listed at Talk:List of network management systems#Non-notable entries. Some are obvious deletion candidates, others less clearly so. Other editors' help in assessing which to keep and which to delete would be appreciated. --A. B. ^(talk) 19:22, 27 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Delete I think it can be rewritten to demonstrate notability, but looking at the first 100 google hits I'm not very confident of that.jonathon 00:49, 28 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I don't have an axe to grind -- if someone does show this is notable, I'm happy to keep. --A. B. ^(talk) 02:02, 28 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Apparently insufficient sources to establish notability. Doctorfluffy 06:07, 29 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Comment A search for "intellipool" shows up 77.600 hits on google. If there is a problem with the article from an editoral point of view I can understand that. But deleting it based on a split second search on google is wrong, if that where the case, most articles (if not all) relating to any software product would go the same way. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.115.158.58 (talk) 13:34, 30 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This IP is registered to Intellipool and has only been used for Intellipool-related edits. --A. B. ^(talk) 16:02, 30 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

See the detailed discussion at Talk:Intellipool Network Monitor regarding unique Google hits (196) as well as unproductive Google News and Google News Archive searches. --A. B. ^(talk) 15:59, 30 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]