Talk:Internet Explorer for UNIX

Icon?..

I don't think the icon uswed currently fits in with the Unix version, as it is the Macintosh one! Could someone upload a PNG of the current version? Thanks RaviC

Disappearance

I trimmed the "Mysterious disappearance" section a bit. Mostly because it was a borderline original research ("If one were to take the analogy further...") and it was also speculative ("it could be that..."). Further, it had lots of weaseling ("some consider"). It's fine to say "MS won the browser war and then rested on its laurels", and everyone knows that, but can we point to a reference that says so?

But the bigger question in that case is, even if we do source this stuff, do we care, and does it have any relevance to this topic? Microsoft's love-hate relationship with Unixen probably needs an article of its own...

Now don't get me wrong, I have the same opinion as the article's former conclusions were; I just couldn't justify their existence in the current form, and I don't think speculation in general has place in Wikipedia.

And frankly, its disappearance wasn't "mysterious". Unprofitable and uncomfortable projects get discontinued all the time. What was mysterious that the browser existed at all in the first place. =) --wwwwolf (barks/growls) 18:25, 23 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Oh yeah, and I'd like to note that external links on the speculation are probably OK though, they may provide additional insight with no constraints set by Wikipedia's policies - just don't go using them as sources or something =) --wwwwolf (barks/growls) 18:27, 23 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Just in case anyone comes looking, the "mysterious disappearance" section can be viewed here. Maybe the talk page is indeed the best place for this :) -- Limulus 13:25, 6 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:IE Unix.PNG

Image:IE Unix.PNG is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 08:41, 1 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't upload the file, but I filled out the stupid form. I hate how the overzealous adherence to the rules (rather than investing the time to actually FIX the problem) results in a form of censorship that's IMHO more insidious than the vandals. OK, I've had my rant for today. -- Limulus 18:24, 1 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Agrees. It's the fucking logo, dipshit bot, it's in the rules!~~Lazyguythewerewolf . Rawr. 08:50, 14 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]