Jump to content

Talk:Power transition theory

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Twentyfourfifteen (talk | contribs) at 16:40, 10 October 2007 (The redundant article Power Transition Theory (with the capitals)...). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

This article was selected for DYK!

Did You Know An entry from Power transition theory appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know? column on December 24, 2006.
Wikipedia
Wikipedia

++Lar: t/c 06:32, 24 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Shouldn't it be advantageOUS and disadvantageOUS nations?

No, because those words apply to things that "give" advantage, not things that "have" it. A sword in battle is advantageous while its wielder is advantaged. China, for example, may be advantageous to have as an ally, but that doesn't necessarily mean that it holds advantage over anyone else. A similar confusion occurs with the terms nauseous and nauseated (a person is usually not "nauseous" unless he or she actually causes others to feel sick).

The redundant article Power Transition Theory (with the capitals)...

...needs to be merged into here by someone knowledgable. (It's not quite as thorough, but I notice a few gems of data that I don't think this article has.) Who's up to the task? —Lenoxus 17:35, 14 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]


That article Power Transition Theory is structured much better than this one so I would contend that this article should be merged into that one. Twentyfourfifteen 16:40, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]