User talk:GodGnipael

Hello GodGnipael, and welcome to Wikipedia! Here are some recommended guidelines to help you get involved. Please feel free to contact me if you need help with anything. Best of luck and happy editing! Fuhghettaboutit 03:17, 21 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
Wikipedia Tutorial How to edit a page The five pillars of Wikipedia Manual of Style Be bold in editing How to write a great article WikiProjects
Getting your info out there
Cite your sources Neutral Point of View Point of View Verifiability Uploading images Image use policy
Getting more Wikipedia rules
Policy Library

Getting help
New contributors' help page Where to ask a question Help Desk Frequently Asked Questions
Getting along
Wikipedians Wikiquette Civility Sign your posts Conflict resolution
Getting technical
Pages needing attention Peer review Utilities Village pump

Moscoto

Your edit [1] does not follow the manual of style for how to correctly create wikilinks; and there is not reason not to have a link to Muscat. Perhaps you would like to explain why you think your edit is improving the article on its talk page: Talk:Moscato. --ZimZalaBim (talk) 02:40, 12 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sign your comments

As a courtesy for other editors, kindly observe Wikipedia guidelines and sign your talk page and user talk page posts. To do so simply add four tildes (~~~~) at the end of your comments and your user name or IP address and the date will be automatically added. For further info see: Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines. Thanks. --ZimZalaBim (talk) 02:56, 12 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Personal attack warning

Please see Wikipedia's no personal attacks policy. Comment on content, not on the contributor; personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Note that continued personal attacks may lead to blocks for disruption. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. Gwernol 03:01, 12 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Melatonin

Hi there. Please have a look at our neutral point of view policy. "Dangerous Side Effects" is not an appropriate section heading; it is unnecessarily sensationalistic. Facts speak for themselves—there is no need to editorialize. I won't revert your edit, but I would appreciate it if you could help make content more neutral and impartial. Fvasconcellos (t·c) 02:12, 25 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi again. Fortunately or unfortunately, it isn't really Wikipedia's role to...protect readers, rather to present verifiable information in a neutral manner. There's no reason to remove information backed up by a reliable, scholarly source, but even such information must be written in an impartial manner, and wording shouldn't be meant to "scare" or "warn" potential readers. Fvasconcellos (t·c) 02:26, 25 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]