Talk:Yield spread premium
![]() | Law Unassessed | |||||||||
|
Breech of nPOV
In my opinion, items 1-3 are partisan and reflect the positions of non-upfront mortgage brokers. The article, as such, is biased in favor of mortgage brokers.
Item #4 (Upfront Mortgage Brokers) is needed to recreate balance. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 70.110.12.146 at 06:06, 25 July 2006
- This page is like an ad for so called Up Front Mortgage Brokers (links and all). References need to be eliminated or trimmed. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 69.231.56.199 at 01:14, 14 November 2006
- This page is very biased to mortgage brokers. YSP is how mortgage brokers line their pockets at the expense of their customers. This was clearly written by a broker. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 199.173.226.227 at 02:11, 6 December 2006
So how do direct lenders/banks line their pocket's? They do not even disclose what they really make on the borrower's loan.
- The Upfront Mortgage broker thing is an advertisement with links and all. This is a joke! —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 69.231.96.42 (Talk) at 01:22, 30 December 2006
- So how does someone get aroung the YSP or even Brokerage fees? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 192.25.240.225 (Talk) at 17:54, 24 January 2007
- Nothing is free. No closing costs loans are done by the broker increasing the rate to a point where the YSP covers all the costs (including broker fees). Brokers need to make a living too. YSP is generally disclosed on the HUD...keep an eye out. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 76.167.237.138 (Talk) at 05:55, 26 January 2007
- Conventional Mortgage Brokers don't want people to know about UMBs. Anybody who is considering buying a loan, however, needs to understand that not all mortgage brokers are conventional brokers. Some are not. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 70.110.5.44 (Talk) at 09:30, 24 February 2007
Cleanup Call - "anti YSP" non-neutral POV
This article could use more cleanup than I'm able to take on. It seems to be written in a "anti YSP" non-neutral POV, by use of phrases like "they point out that there are truly legitimate reasons", suggesting earning a commission for doing a mortgage is illegitimate. Also "and hide how much YSP they will receive until closing", which is again not true. Non-UMB brokers may discuss their YSP with a borrower the same as a UMB broker would, and act in accordance with UMB guidelines while not calling themself a member of the UMB program. The implication that any non-UMB broker is dishonest or acting against the best interest of their customers is a gross POV violation. I won't go so far as to flag the whole article as a POV violation, but someone with more wiki experience should re-write some of this article. Some mention should be made that wholesale lenders which also work with the public (such as banks) have higher retail rates than wholesale rates. In my experience for a vanilla 30-year fixed rate perfect credit borrower, a bank's retail rate would pay about 1% to 1.5% YSP through their own wholesale channel. Of course, there are also many non-bank wholesale lenders that do not work with the public at all. Jonathan Roy 19:45, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
Is "hide how much YSP they will receive until closing" really "not true"?
Please see http://www.mtgprofessor.com/A%20-%20Mortgage%20Brokers/hud_and_yield_spread_premiums.htm
Specifically, if the broker is required to put in a "range of compensation" - say 1-5% in the est. HUD-1, she is still hiding the true fee - she knows it when the loan is locked in, the borrower won't learn it until closing.
Regarding "some non-UMB broker may share the amount of YSP" (hence act like a UMB) - this might be true, but in my experience I haven't met a non-UMB who would (called several when shopping for my mortgage.) In fact, when confronted, all explicitly refused - some politely, some not so.
The article makes contradictory statements regarding the disclosure requirements of YSP on the GFE. In parts, it states that the 2002 RESPA proposed legislation would have required the disclosure, in parts, it states a compensation range must be disclosed, one person added a statement that the exact amount must be disclosed on the GFE. Somebody with legal knowledge should provide clarification with citations. It likely varies between states.
Globalise tag
This page discusses a US only topic without any wider context. The terminology is obscure and uses many terms with US only meanings. simonthebold 13:00, 25 July 2007 (UTC)