Jump to content

Talk:Configurable Network Computing

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by S.K. (talk | contribs) at 12:57, 22 August 2007 (→Will soon be removing the wikified notice). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

A CNC advertisement?

This notion that the article is stupid reflects ignorance of the technology. The Configurable Network Computing architecture or CNC is NOT a product that can be sold. It has its strengths and weaknesses just as does any architecture. SimonATL 19:38, 21 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The {{advert}} note says This article or section is written like an advertisement. This for me is mainly about the language and style. When I skimmed the article, certain sentences stood out. The first sentence states for example [...] implements scalable enterprise-wide business solutions software that can run on a wide variety of hardware, operations systems (OS) and hardware platforms. Later down there is the CNC architecture combines the these advantages with its own flexible architecture to combine support for a web-based thin client through its implementation of a Java Applications or (JAS) server architecture with its own flexible technology and a little further down CNC technology will seamlessly and transparently act as a glue holding this heterogenous system together in a well-managed and risk-disbursed/diminished way. I could probably continue, but overall the tone of the article to me sounds not really "encyclopedic", more like ad copy. My impression, that I expressed with the {{advert}}. BTW, this be called "stupid" doesn't help discussions. Thanks, --S.K. 12:41, 22 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Will soon be removing the wikified notice

The links are directly to the originators of the technology if readers want more information. Also, the article is footnoted and does meet wiki standards. Please demonstrate why this claim is accurate. Editors should not just add tags with absolutely no discussion. This violates wikipedia policies. Let's discuss. SimonATL 19:46, 21 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The {{wikify}} is mostly because there are large stretches of text without any wiki links at all, in particular towards the end of the article. The template itself expresses what needs to be done, it says in particular, [...] improve [...] relevant internal links. To me it doesn't help you adding a sentence like This violates wikipedia policies, without pointing towards those policies, since I've never seen a policy stating this. But I'm happy to learn if you can point me towards it. --S.K. 12:57, 22 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Configurable_Network_Computing&oldid=152911651"