Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wikiproject Graphical content problem

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was keep moink 02:13, 10 May 2005 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Wikiproject Graphical content problem

I promise I will not suggest any more ideas on how to improve Wikipedia. I will not ever take part in any creative thought. Please delete this as soon as possible. I can not tollerate sarcasm anymore. I had enough of them in every project I proposed --Cool Cat ^{My Talk} 09:53, 25 Apr 2005 (UTC)

• Delete --Cool Cat ^{My Talk} 09:58, 25 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Delete — Davenbelle 10:09, Apr 25, 2005 (UTC)

• Keep but mark as {{rejected}} — Davenbelle 11:22, Apr 25, 2005 (UTC)

• Keep but mark as {{historical}}{{rejected}}*. I have nothing against trying to improve Wikipedia or creative thoughts - in fact I encourage them. I just don't feel that this particular proposal can be NPOV. I'm sure that others will propose something similar in the future, and in such cases we can have this as a reference. Thryduulf 10:40, 25 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • *re the best template, I think a modifed {{rejected}} would be best, noting it was a wikiproject rather than a policy. Thryduulf 01:15, 26 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Keep as deprecated Wikiproject. Mark as such. This issue does come up every couple of months so keeping the history would be useful. Radiant_* 11:29, Apr 25, 2005 (UTC)
• Keep as deprecated project, per Radiant. It might be a good idea for someone who is more familiar with the history of the issue on Wikipedia to compile a list of past censorship-related issues. There has been a recent spate of proposals filtering through templates for deletion regarding templates for adult content warnings, graphic violence, etc. This type of thing seems to come up fairly regularly, and it might be nice to have all the references in one place so we don't have to keep repeating the same arguments. --TenOfAllTrades (talk/contrib) 12:31, 25 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Keep and mark as above. --InShaneee 14:14, 25 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Keep as above. --Carnildo 18:46, 25 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Yep, keep as above. Samaritan 22:53, 25 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• keep Yuckfoo 01:13, 26 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Keep. This "project" hasn't been rejected yet--there's not even a discussion page. I'm not sure it's a project, though--it feels more like a policy proposal to me. Demi ^T/_C 07:23, 2005 Apr 30 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.