Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Standard PHP Library

phpcruft. wikipedia does not need a new article for every chapter of the php manual Misterdiscreet 19:55, 20 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Keep and expand - C standard library, C++ standard library, if you're going to include other popular libraries, this should be included as well. Google returns 41,000+ records for this, it's not like it's obscure or not in use. Joe User NY 20:53, 20 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- there are 103,000+ records on Google for fgetc(stdin). let's create an article on that! there also is precedent for deleting phpcruft. see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PHP Data Objects (2nd nomination), Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PHP Data Objects, and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/BCMath Misterdiscreet 21:02, 20 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  - Be careful what you wish for, the consensus is that being a unix command is already a valid basis for an article, so individual C, C++, and C# functions will surely follow. Spazure 10:31, 21 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  - Comparing a function to an entire library is not a valid comparison or argument and you should know that. I don't think it's phpcruft, I think it's a library on it's way to becoming a certified standard. Joe User NY 21:07, 20 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep This could be expanded into a good article and has no problem with WP:NN. Nicko (Talk•Contribs) 01:19, 21 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]