Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Boolean programming method
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by RenamedUser jaskldjslak904 (talk | contribs) at 20:31, 20 July 2007 (close discussion: delete). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.Revision as of 20:31, 20 July 2007 by RenamedUser jaskldjslak904 (talk | contribs) (close discussion: delete)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. this article is crap isn't a valid reason for delete btwJaranda wat's sup 20:31, 20 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Boolean programming method (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
Orphaned stub which is not notable and fails the Google test. Not to be confused with Boolean Programming Method (uppercase), which I am also nominating.
I'm not sure exactly what this article is talking about: using a lot of if statements? A lot of nested ifs? If anyone knows what the article means, perhaps this can be merged to an appropriate article. Tualha (Talk) 14:10, 15 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment - "Boolean programming" gets a fair number of Google hits. ugen64 16:12, 15 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- If you leave out the word "method", then yes, there are many hits. But they all seem to be about advanced algorithms and heuristics, and to have nothing to do with whatever kind of hack technique this article is talking about. Tualha (Talk) 17:40, 15 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete or redirect I believe the article is talking about the same antipattern we already discuss at coding by exception. Although given the apparent non-notability of the term, I'm not sure a redirect would be entirely appropriate. JulesH 18:27, 15 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Mmm, or possibly superboolean logic as listed in Anti-pattern: "unnecessary comparison or abstraction of boolean arithmetic". Tualha (Talk) 21:43, 15 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, I've seen the type of hack it's talking about but I don't see that it's called this. We should have an article on Boolean programming itself, though, and we don't. Otherwise I would make it a redirect there. --Dhartung | Talk 18:39, 15 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- When I googled "boolean programming", I got the impression that the term covers several different areas. There seems to be one kind associated with fuzzy logic; and possibly a distinct kind called quadratic boolean programming; and something called pseudo-boolean programming, though that might be simply a variation. I also got the vague impression that perhaps "programming" was used in the same sense as in "linear programming", as opposed to the sort you do to a computer. Hard to say for sure, since a lot of the links require subscriptions to read. Tualha (Talk) 21:43, 15 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- They are all related topics, and much more mathematical and logic topics than computer topics. I'm not a CS or Math major, but I do know it has to do with set theory and at least in some versions calculus comes into play.--Dhartung | Talk 04:27, 16 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- (In any case, we agree, the article is not a good article on the topic by any means.) --Dhartung | Talk 04:29, 16 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- They are all related topics, and much more mathematical and logic topics than computer topics. I'm not a CS or Math major, but I do know it has to do with set theory and at least in some versions calculus comes into play.--Dhartung | Talk 04:27, 16 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- When I googled "boolean programming", I got the impression that the term covers several different areas. There seems to be one kind associated with fuzzy logic; and possibly a distinct kind called quadratic boolean programming; and something called pseudo-boolean programming, though that might be simply a variation. I also got the vague impression that perhaps "programming" was used in the same sense as in "linear programming", as opposed to the sort you do to a computer. Hard to say for sure, since a lot of the links require subscriptions to read. Tualha (Talk) 21:43, 15 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - this article is crap -- Whpq 18:06, 19 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.