Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2000 AD glossary

2000 AD glossary

Violation of Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary, article content moved to wikt:Transwiki:2000 AD glossary. —Remember the dot ^(talk) 19:02, 18 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Not much I can add here. Wikipedia is not a dictionary and there's a reason we have Wiktionary. Spellcast 19:12, 18 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom.--SarekOfVulcan 19:37, 18 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as explained on the talk page this fails the transwiki the criteria for inclusion and should never have been transwikied. (Emperor 19:39, 18 July 2007 (UTC))[reply]

I didn't know that; thanks for pointing that out. Even so, I'm not sure that this is something that belongs in Wikipedia. —Remember the dot ^(talk) 20:00, 18 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yes there is possibly no ideal solution (I flagged this quite a while ago and nothing has come up) - it doesn't fit at Wiktionary (and will/should probably be deleted eventually when someone goes through the backlog) and there probably isn't a suitable wikia wiki to transwiki it to (as may have been the solution at some point in the future), so we'll just see where how things cards fall. (Emperor 00:05, 19 July 2007 (UTC))[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletions. -- Artw 20:37, 18 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]